Teams

NNM 3.0M ALTO - Ginocchio

2023 USTA Adult 18 & Over League - NNM · 3.0 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.07 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-04-30vs NNM/McDermott/18 & Over/3.0MSplit 22
L#1 DoublesPhilip Polzer / John Sarracino vs Adan Leon / Joe McDermott2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPaul Andrus / Jacob Cohen vs Tanner Adams / David Harris2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesGarth Hancock vs David Gonzales6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesGanesh Singh / Micah Thomas vs Kameron Bowers / Travis Collins6-4, 6-3
2023-04-16vs NNM 3.0M HP - MollerWon 21
W#1 DoublesPhilip Polzer / James Engstrom vs James MacKenzie / Charles Merz6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesGarth Hancock vs Christopher Tanner7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesPaul Andrus vs Mike Parrish3-6, 4-6
2023-04-15vs NNM 3.0M HP - MollerLost 04
L#1 DoublesPhilip Polzer / David Dawson vs Charles Merz / Mike Parrish6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPaul Andrus vs Md Parvez Mollah2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesErnest Pacheco / Micah Thomas vs Marc Beneteau / Kerry Kiernan6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGary Haman / Joseph Ginocchio vs Christopher Tanner / LW Wilson6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2023-04-08vs NNM/McDermott/18 & Over/3.0MLost 05
L#1 DoublesPhilip Polzer / James Engstrom vs Angelo Ferreira / Tanner Adams2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesPaul Andrus vs Dainius Skauda0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesGary Haman / John Sarracino vs David Harris / Daniel Lee2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesGanesh Singh vs Manny Zubia1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMicah Thomas / Ernest Pacheco vs Daniel Galvis / David Gonzales5-7, 0-6
2023-03-19vs NNM/McDermott/18 & Over/3.0MSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJames Engstrom / Philip Polzer vs Daniel Galvis / Joe McDermott5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGary Haman / Paul Andrus vs John Medina / Adan Leon2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAlex Salvato vs David Harris3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJacob Cohen / Ganesh Singh vs Elchin Zeynalov / Kameron Bowers6-4, 6-4
2023-03-05vs NNM 3.0M HP - MollerWon 40
W#1 DoublesPhilip Polzer / John Sarracino vs Marc Beneteau / James MacKenzie6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDavid Dawson / James Engstrom vs Kerry Kiernan / James Sallee6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesGarth Hancock vs Christopher Tanner6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJacob Cohen / Ganesh Singh vs Daniel DeWent / Charles Merz6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alex Salvato
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Philip Polzer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Garth Hancock
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
3.06
Paul Andrus
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.81
Gary Haman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
David Dawson
published 3
Ganesh Singh
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
Jacob Cohen
published 3
2.27
Ernest Pacheco
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.19
Joseph Ginocchio
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
G W Rodenz
published
James Engstrom
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
John Sarracino
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Micah Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Philip Polzer + Paul Andrus111054% games+11.6% vs expected
Gary Haman + Paul Andrus161156% games−1.3% vs expected
Joseph Ginocchio + Ernest Pacheco044 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Ginocchio + Gary Haman134 matchesnot enough data
James Engstrom + Philip Polzer314 matchesnot enough data
Jacob Cohen + James Engstrom213 matchesnot enough data
John Sarracino + Philip Polzer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alex Salvato
10W–16L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Philip Polzer
40W–48L career · 6 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Garth Hancock
19W–13L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
3.06
Paul Andrus
61W–64L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
3.06
3
Gary Haman
46W–48L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%92%8%
2.81
3
David Dawson
6W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Ganesh Singh
20W–26L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Jacob Cohen
18W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Ernest Pacheco
16W–66L career · 2 lines in 2023
96%4%<1%
2.27
Joseph Ginocchio
3W–20L career · 1 line in 2023
99%1%<1%
2.19
G W Rodenz
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
James Engstrom
19W–12L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
John Sarracino
8W–19L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Micah Thomas
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.