Teams

MLong-ENO

2024 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Weekend

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-09-29vs Naftel/Patzer-SVCSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMary T Long / Nancy Sickel vs Donna Misa / Lauren Kulp6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAine Lynch / Allison Taylor vs Erin McElligott / Lisa Simmons5-7, 1-6
2024-09-28vs LBible-ENOLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary T Long / Celina Morice vs Kristie Elliott / Nsimba Mahungu6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSara Lawrence / Alana Brown vs Loralie Bible / Kristin Cooley5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAllison Taylor / Kari Lovetinsky vs Kathleen Young / Kelly Conklin1-6, 2-6
2024-09-22vs EMillard-ENOSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSara Lawrence / Kari Lovetinsky vs Mary Plankenhorn / Ami Young1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMary T Long / Celina Morice vs Katie Masood / Olivia Ward6-2, 6-2
2024-09-08vs LBaxter-CHTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCelina Morice / Alana Brown vs Elizabeth McNamara / Breah Woolson0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Carlson / Aine Lynch vs Sarah DeVore / Lisa Baxter4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-08-25vs KGreen-ENOWon 20
W#1 DoublesSara Loeblein / Sara Lawrence vs Shelly Guo / Jeannette Brown7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAine Lynch / Anna Whaley vs Stephanie Ross / Taiqin Huang7-6, 7-5
2024-08-18vs GLoFrese-EPHWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaura Carlson / Nancy Sickel vs Barbara Wilhelm / Leslie Jackson6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMegan Chiles / Allison Taylor vs Kara Lardinois / Janet Ranheim6-1, 6-3
2024-08-11vs JDeConto-ENOWon 30
W#1 DoublesMegan Chiles / Sara Lawrence vs Chelsea Donahue / Beth Dingler6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNancy Sickel / Sara Loeblein vs Sarah Cunningham / Christina Pipkin6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCelina Morice / Kari Lovetinsky vs Julie DeConto / Natalie Carlson6-1, 6-2
2024-08-04vs KNorris-ENOLost 01
L#1 DoublesNancy Sickel / Celina Morice vs Sarah Franks / Laurie Straube4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Megan Chiles
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.35
Celina Morice
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.21
Sara Loeblein
published
3.04
Sara Lawrence
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.03
Nancy Sickel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.01
Aine Lynch
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.97
Lizzy Burch
published 3
2.82
Mary T Long
published
2.81
Kari Lovetinsky
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
Anna Whaley
published 3
Liz Morris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kari Lovetinsky + Sara Lawrence044 matchesnot enough data
Kari Lovetinsky + Megan Chiles314 matchesnot enough data
Sara Lawrence + Mary T Long303 matchesnot enough data
Mary T Long + Lizzy Burch303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Megan Chiles
155W–47L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
3.5
Celina Morice
93W–79L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%86%13%
3.35
Sara Loeblein
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.21
3
Sara Lawrence
160W–120L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.04
3.5
Nancy Sickel
63W–75L career · 4 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.03
3
Aine Lynch
21W–26L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Lizzy Burch
44W–35L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
Mary T Long
48W–104L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Kari Lovetinsky
116W–121L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Anna Whaley
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Liz Morris
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.