← Teams

Siehoff

2022 WI Other · 2022 WI Adult 55+ 7.0 Mixed Weekend Warrior

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-10-09vs ArmitageLost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJohn Plotkin / Melanie Kuzmanovic vs John Cao / Lynn Armitage5-8
L#2 DoublesJames Lambiris / Kathy Kort vs Karelyn Hopkins / Michael Finnegan8-9
L#3 DoublesRob Martin / Robin Siehoff vs Theresa Palasota / Tom Leggett1-8
2022-10-09vs HammondLost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJames Lambiris / Kathy Kort vs David Gahagan / Zita Wenda2-8
L#2 DoublesPaul Lickteig / PATRICIA EICHTEN vs Ken Redman / Amy Buege6-8
W#3 DoublesJohn Plotkin / Melanie Kuzmanovic vs Kevin Struck / Christine Frank9-7
2022-10-09vs RichmondLost 0–3
L#1 DoublesRobin Siehoff / Rob Martin vs Linda Match / Rick O'Connor1-8
L#2 DoublesJames Lambiris / Melanie Kuzmanovic vs Maurice Russell / Kathryn Tweet5-8
L#3 DoublesPaul Lickteig / PATRICIA EICHTEN vs Richard Vincent / Carrie Buri5-8
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2022 WI Adult 55+ 7.0 Mixed Weekend Warrior
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hammond2163356
2Richmond2163346
3Armitage2154451
4Siehoff0318872

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Joyce Koker
published —
3.61
Melanie Kuzmanovic
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
James Lambiris
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Kathy Kort
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
PATRICIA EICHTEN
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
—
John Plotkin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published —
—
Paul Lickteig
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published —
—
Rob Martin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published —
—
Robin Siehoff
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Kuzmanovic + PATRICIA EICHTEN3–254% games+5.0% vs expected
James Lambiris + Rob Martin7–455% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—
Joyce Koker
97W–46L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.84
3.5
Melanie Kuzmanovic
151W–72L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%19%81%
3.61
3.5
James Lambiris
46W–33L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
Kathy Kort
92W–58L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
PATRICIA EICHTEN
100W–74L career · 2 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
—
John Plotkin
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
—
—
Paul Lickteig
8W–20L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
—
—
Rob Martin
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
—
—
Robin Siehoff
12W–25L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.