Teams

Stovall/FS/HO

2025 Adult 55 & Over Spring League · 4.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-04vs Newby/VB/HOWon 20
W#1 DoublesDiane Sturgill / Laura Hood vs Teresa Killough / Barbara Daniel6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKim Wohlford / Mary McCain vs Teresa Brooks / Cindy Koenigseder6-1, 6-2
2025-01-21vs Newby/VB/HOWon 21
L#1 DoublesDawn Stovall / Janice Taylor vs Teresa Killough / Barbara Daniel3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLaura Hood / Mischelle Roam vs Stephanie Wright / Cindy Koenigseder6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKim Wohlford / Diane Sturgill vs Kim Newby / Teresa Brooks6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Diane Sturgill
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Kim Wohlford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Laura Hood
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Janice Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Mischelle Roam
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Dawn Stovall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.17
Conni Ulmschneider
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.99
C Aretha Lamar
published 3.5
Mary McCain
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Wohlford + Diane Sturgill6160% gamesnot enough data
Laura Hood + Mischelle Roam4157% gamesnot enough data
Janice Taylor + Laura Hood314 matchesnot enough data
C Aretha Lamar + Janice Taylor033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diane Sturgill
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Kim Wohlford
15W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
Laura Hood
11W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
Janice Taylor
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.46
Mischelle Roam
13W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
4
Dawn Stovall
6W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.19
3.5
Conni Ulmschneider
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
C Aretha Lamar
3W–11L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
Mary McCain
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.