Teams

Riverstone - A Mallette

2022 Collier Combo 18 & Over Summer · Combo 18 & Over 7.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-25vs Quail West - SeeseLost 01
L#3 DoublesKaren Tumulty / Lucy Slaboch vs Karen Dunbar / Susan Phelps5-7, 5-7
2022-08-18vs Naples Grande - C.RogersLost 01
L#3 DoublesKaren Tumulty / Audra DiDonato vs Mara Mazza / Cheryl Ingram3-6, 1-6
2022-07-21vs Quail West - SeeseSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAmy Schiffer / Karen Tumulty vs Sherri Kelleher / Mary Varilek7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAmanda Mallette / Aimee Hummel vs Faye Johnson / Darina Cammarato4-6, 2-6
2022-07-14vs Naples Grande - C.RogersLost 03
L#1 DoublesEileen Valerio / Aimee Hummel vs Sara Munholland / Betsy Moreno Berger2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMacey Tyll / Karen Tumulty vs Jocie Jandovitz / Kimberly Davey6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKelly Stein / Audra DiDonato vs Katie Lober / Megan Homan3-6, 4-6
2022-07-07vs COLLIER /Marco YMCA - WashakLost 01
L#2 DoublesLucy Slaboch / Karen Tumulty vs Susanna Haedelt / Jeanette Thevening1-6, 4-6
2022-06-30vs Heritage Bay - BargerLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarrie Stowell / Audra DiDonato vs Carla Klumpp / Mia Delk2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Macey Tyll
published
3.86
Eileen Valerio
published 4
3.80
Amanda Mallette
published 4
3.62
Kelly Stein
published
3.61
Nikki Miller
published
3.35
Lucy Slaboch
published
3.32
Amy Schiffer
published 3.5
3.19
Karen Tumulty
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.14
Audra DiDonato
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Aimee Hummel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Mallette + Eileen Valerio7066% games+7.3% vs expected
Eileen Valerio + Kelly Stein5250% games−6.3% vs expected
Audra DiDonato + Amy Schiffer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Macey Tyll
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Eileen Valerio
16W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
Amanda Mallette
12W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.80
Kelly Stein
9W–2L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Nikki Miller
30W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%20%80%
3.61
Lucy Slaboch
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Amy Schiffer
19W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Karen Tumulty
56W–84L career · 5 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Audra DiDonato
94W–159L career · 3 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Aimee Hummel
48W–67L career · 2 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.