Teams

ACombs (BCC)

2024 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 5.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-02vs AHall/RPlaisance (Raintree)Split 11
L#2 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Carrie Baker vs Paula Abrams / Kimberly Powell0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKate MacRone / Rachel Couchenour vs Melissa Orr / Rona Karacaova6-1, 6-1
2024-09-25vs MWolf/TAmos (WSRC)Split 11
L#2 DoublesKate MacRone / Amy Combs vs Pamela Trantham / Kristina Campbell6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Rachel Couchenour vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-18vs RJampani (Blakeney)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesVeronica Dieckmann / Kate MacRone vs Shikha Agrawal / Melanie Cox1-6, 0-6
2024-09-11vs AMcCurry/LPorcher (Carmel)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Emily Hak vs Sarah Miller / Leigh Porcher6-3, 6-1
2024-09-04vs JJZhu/ZMarenic (Jeff Adams)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKate MacRone / Amy Combs vs Zahide Marenic / Connie Arevalo2-6, 3-6
2024-08-28vs AHall/RPlaisance (Raintree)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKate MacRone / Veronica Dieckmann vs Suzanne MacVicar / Angela Thomas3-6, 0-6
2024-08-21vs MWolf/TAmos (WSRC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKate MacRone / Amy Combs vs Laurie Madonna / Christine Rasmussen4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Melodie Ohaus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Kate MacRone
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.58
Vonda Huss
published
2.56
Amy Combs
published 3
2.49
Natalie Corrigan
published
2.29
Suzanne Meeker
published
Emily Hak
published
Golin Kosowitz
published
Rachel Couchenour
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Melodie Ohaus
98W–142L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Kate MacRone
76W–122L career · 12 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Vonda Huss
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
2.58
3
Amy Combs
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
2.56
Natalie Corrigan
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.49
Suzanne Meeker
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
2.29
Emily Hak
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Golin Kosowitz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rachel Couchenour
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.