Teams

BHSC Daniero

2022 Charlottesville Singles · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-11-07vs ACAC Slice GirlsWon 20
W#1 SinglesAmanda Daniero vs Melissa Zeller7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAmy Taggart vs Pamela Jupin7-5, 7-6
2022-11-02vs SweetsWon 10
W#1 SinglesAmanda Daniero vs Blair Hubbard6-0, 6-0
2022-10-26Won 10
W#3 SinglesKelly Lindauer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-19vs SweetsWon 10
W#1 SinglesKelly Lindauer vs Jeanne Ward6-3, 6-1
2022-10-12vs Forest Lakes BaumanWon 10
W#3 SinglesAmanda Daniero vs Linda Corradino6-4, 6-2
2022-10-07vs ACAC Slice GirlsWon 10
W#1 SinglesKelly Lindauer vs Susan Bayliss6-1, 3-1
2022-10-05vs SweetsWon 20
W#1 SinglesAmanda Daniero vs Jeanne Ward6-1, 7-5
W#3 SinglesAmy Taggart vs Mary Primm6-4, 6-3
2022-09-28vs Forest Lakes BaumanSplit 11
W#2 SinglesKelly Lindauer vs Linda Corradino6-3, 6-1
L#3 SinglesAmy Taggart vs Jenny Furlow1-6, 4-6
2022-09-21vs ACAC Slice GirlsWon 21
W#1 SinglesKelly Lindauer vs Beth Hollen6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAmanda Daniero vs Susan Bayliss3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 SinglesAmy Taggart vs Melissa Zeller6-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Lauren Suggs
published
3.68
Janette Murphy
published
3.46
Kelly Lindauer
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.43
Carrie Cooper
published 3.5
Heidi Binko
published 3.5
3.22
Amy Taggart
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 38% · published 3.5
3.22
Amanda Daniero
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Lindauer + Amanda Daniero3354% gamesnot enough data
Amanda Daniero + Amy Taggart404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Suggs
13W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%33%67%
4.06
Janette Murphy
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Kelly Lindauer
89W–47L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Carrie Cooper
13W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Heidi Binko
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Amy Taggart
142W–98L career · 8 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Amanda Daniero
111W–59L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.