Teams

An.Collicutt40S

2026 Capital Singles 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-01vs Br.Ross40SLost 02
L#2 SinglesChris Clayton vs Tom Pullara6-7, 1-6
L#3 SinglesEric Striegel vs Drew Douglass2-6, 2-6
2026-07-18vs Ca.Barker40SLost 12
W#1 SinglesAdam Baltzer vs Brad Manning6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJay Ratia vs Ronald Elliott1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesBrian Fields vs Bruce Elder1-6, 3-6
2026-06-27vs De.Farmer40S3.0Lost 12
L#1 SinglesAndrew Collicutt vs Yung Hung Chang2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesChris Clayton vs Donzell Newkirk3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesJay Ratia vs Gary Carlson6-0, 6-1
2026-06-21vs Br.Pickett40SLost 12
L#1 SinglesAdam Baltzer vs David Kelly4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesAndrew Collicutt vs Brian Pickett6-1, 7-5
L#3 SinglesBrian Fields vs Jason Grieco4-6, 3-6
2026-06-13vs Ro.Harris40SWon 20
W#1 SinglesAdam Baltzer vs Patrick Dougherty7-6, 6-2
W#3 SinglesChris Clayton vs Thomas Belch6-2, 6-2
2026-06-08vs Ca.Barker40SWon 20
W#1 SinglesAdam Baltzer vs David Coman6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesEric Striegel vs Brad Manning6-3, 6-1
2026-06-06vs Pa.Shimp40SWon 20
W#2 SinglesEric Striegel vs Christopher Glass6-4, 6-4
W#3 SinglesJay Ratia vs Lewis Carroll6-4, 6-3
2026-05-30vs Br.Ross40SLost 03
L#1 SinglesAdam Baltzer vs Jason Emanuel2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesChris Clayton vs Brian Ross6-7, 1-6
L#3 SinglesBrian Fields vs Brian Josephs0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ca.Barker40S6217718159
2Br.Ross40S5315921182
3De.Farmer40S3.053131123199
4Br.Pickett40S53121229231
5An.Collicutt40S35111328221
6Ro.Harris40S35101431224
7Pa.Shimp40S1761837235

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Adam Baltzer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.82
Andrew Collicutt
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.71
Jay Ratia
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.62
Brian Fields
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.60
Chris Clayton
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
2.58
Eric Striegel
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Adam Baltzer
18W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.04
3
Andrew Collicutt
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Jay Ratia
5W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Brian Fields
1W–7L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.62
3
Chris Clayton
4W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
Eric Striegel
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.