Teams

SGV Arcadia Apex-Li-Arcadia-SU5

2026 Winter Team Singles · SGV - Women 3.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 SinglesKatie Lagen vs Christine Whigham6-3, 3-1
L#2 SinglesSu Li vs Elizabeth Heitner3-6, 5-6
W#3 SinglesJulia Arnold vs Lauren Hayden6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKatie Lagen vs Demmi Setyono6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesJade Kessinger vs Shelly Cohen0-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesSu Li vs Laurene Sandoval5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSu Li vs Ali Laventhol6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJade Kessinger vs Michelle Tesoro3-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesClaudina Mercado vs Doree Shafrir6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKatie Lagen vs Antoinette Lessuk6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJulia Arnold vs Sarah Kloepfer6-1, 6-4
L#3 SinglesClaudina Mercado vs Dayna Moelleken3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJade Kessinger vs Sean Ky6-2, 7-5
W#2 SinglesJulia Arnold vs Angeline Chow6-2, 6-1
L#3 SinglesClaudina Mercado vs Danette Stein6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-02-15vs SGV Dare Doubles-Zane-WN/SU12Lost 12
W#1 SinglesJade Kessinger vs Leslie Le6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesSu Li vs Rachel Newhall1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesJulia Arnold vs Jill Jobran3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKatie Lagen vs Demmi Setyono6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJean Oh vs Claire Rifelj0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesClaudina Mercado vs Andrea Wong3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Katie Lagen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.50
Jade Kessinger
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Su Li
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.17
Julia Arnold
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.09
Hae Oh
published 3.5
2.99
Claudina Mercado
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.85
Jean Oh
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Katie Lagen
68W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.78
3.5
Jade Kessinger
15W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
Su Li
32W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
Julia Arnold
33W–13L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.17
3.5
Hae Oh
1W–7L career · no lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Claudina Mercado
27W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.99
Jean Oh
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
88%12%<1%
2.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.