Teams

Hasty - Highland Country Club 7.0-18+

Sandhills Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 18 & Over Mixed Doubles

9 players · average NTRP 3.57 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-02vs Morgan - Gates Four 7.0 18+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLindsay Sarff / Robert van Geons vs Erika Harris / Michael Nickerson3-6, 3-6
2023-07-09vs Morgan - Gates Four 7.0 18+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSandra Chapman-Wilson / Andrew Pennink vs Andrew Perdue / Teresa MacK0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Shell / Lindsay Sarff vs Rosemary McLean / Daniel Snyder6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2023-07-09vs Morgan - Gates Four 7.0 18+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Shell / Lindsay Sarff vs Emily Morgan / DOHYUN KIM2-6, 5-7
2023-06-30vs Morgan - Gates Four 7.0 18+Split 11
W#1 DoublesDavid Shell / Lindsay Sarff vs Teresa MacK / Robert Johnson2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndrew Pennink / Sandra Chapman-Wilson vs Amanda Maxey / Gene Autry2-6, 5-7
2023-06-08vs Morgan - Gates Four 7.0 18+Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Shell / Lindsay Sarff vs Amanda Maxey / Gene Autry1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 18 & Over Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Sandra Chapman-Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Lindsay Sarff
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.37
Kim Hasty
published 3.5
Andrew Pennink
published 3.5
3.18
Dawn Dixon
published 3.5
3.17
David Hasty
published 3.5
3.04
Robert Hammond
published
2.84
Daniel Gordon
published 3.5
Lisa Maher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Hasty + David Hasty13454% gamesnot enough data
Lindsay Sarff + Andrew Pennink033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sandra Chapman-Wilson
90W–127L career · 2 lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.64
3.5
Lindsay Sarff
71W–54L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%61%38%
3.46
3.5
Kim Hasty
148W–106L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Andrew Pennink
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Dawn Dixon
32W–30L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
David Hasty
25W–24L career · type M · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Robert Hammond
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Daniel Gordon
0W–9L career · no lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
2.84
Lisa Maher
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.