Teams

MO/Echols/40&Over3.5M

2024 Springfield Adult 40 & Over League · 3.5 Adult Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.40 / MISSOURI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-06vs Robert JonesWon 21
W#1 DoublesDavid Lane / Doug Erb vs Rhys Roberts / Clinton Little6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristian Blake / Per Brinck vs David Zimmerman / Greg Pearman6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesTony Roldan / Austin Propst vs Robert Jones / Brian Hayes3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-04-29vs Robert JonesWon 21
L#1 DoublesJames Hanger / Matthew Murrow vs Clinton Little / Robert Jones2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDerrick Dohmen / Doug Erb vs Greg Pearman / Rhys Roberts6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDavid Lane / Chris Wheat vs Brian Hayes / David Zimmerman7-5, 6-3
2024-04-22vs Robert JonesWon 21
W#1 DoublesMatthew Murrow / Austin Propst vs David Zimmerman / Robert Jones6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDaniel Bennett / Christian Blake vs Clinton Little / Rhys Roberts3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Lane / Per Brinck vs Brian Hayes / Greg Pearman6-0, 6-2
2024-04-15vs Robert JonesLost 03
L#1 DoublesJames Hanger / Austin Propst vs Clinton Little / Robert Jones2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDoug Erb / Daniel Bennett vs Robert Love / David Zimmerman6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChris Wheat / Tony Roldan vs Greg Pearman / Rhys Roberts3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-08vs Robert JonesWon 30
W#1 DoublesJames Hanger / Matthew Murrow vs Robert Jones / Robert Love6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristian Blake / Chris Wheat vs David Zimmerman / Greg Pearman6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTony Roldan / Per Brinck vs Brian Hayes / Rhys Roberts6-4, 7-6
2024-04-01vs Robert JonesLost 03
L#1 DoublesJames Hanger / Daniel Bennett vs Robert Jones / Greg Pearman6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDerrick Dohmen vs Clinton Little4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChris Wheat / David Lane vs Robert Love / Brian Hayes3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Leslie Echols
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Christian Blake
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
David Lane
published 3.5
Derrick Dohmen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Austin Propst
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Chris Wheat
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Doug Erb
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
James Hanger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Matthew Murrow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Per Brinck
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tony Roldan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Derrick Dohmen + Matthew Murrow303 matchesnot enough data
Per Brinck + Tony Roldan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leslie Echols
98W–66L career · 4 lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
3.49
3.5
Christian Blake
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
David Lane
15W–28L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Derrick Dohmen
12W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Austin Propst
29W–24L career · 3 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Chris Wheat
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Doug Erb
7W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
James Hanger
6W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Matthew Murrow
33W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Per Brinck
9W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tony Roldan
13W–26L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.