Teams

CAS.DeAngelis

2022 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 5.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-09-23vs PW.StegmanLost 01
L#1 DoublesRuth Crawford / Joanne Kearney vs Renee Stegman / Melinda Reinicker1-6, 2-6
2022-09-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesJodi Harelson / Michiyo Pedersen vs Caroline Graff / Heather Chapman6-1, 6-2
2022-08-26vs MD.HaleWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichiyo Pedersen / Joanne Kearney vs Meredith Heath / Kari Moncrief6-3, 6-1
2022-08-19vs PW.CaseLost 01
L#3 DoublesHeather DeAngelis / Joanne Kearney vs Linda Marcus / Jenn Cooper5-7, 2-6
2022-08-05vs APEX.KeelorSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRuth Crawford / Joanne Kearney vs Sarah Gilreath / Jeannine McClung6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJodi Harelson / Michiyo Pedersen vs Kim Goll / Lora Guerra6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Jennifer Kuzma
published
3.29
Joanne Kearney
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.96
Michiyo Pedersen
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.76
Jodi Harelson
published
2.75
Kelly Schomber
published
2.66
2.65
Catherine Chan
published 3
2.62
Katrina KUCZYNSKI
published
2.60
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michiyo Pedersen + Joanne Kearney8164% gamesnot enough data
Joanne Kearney + Jennifer Kuzma134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Kuzma
66W–71L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
3.5
Joanne Kearney
270W–161L career · 12 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3
Michiyo Pedersen
86W–84L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.96
Jodi Harelson
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76
Kelly Schomber
13W–13L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Heather DeAngelis
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Catherine Chan
6W–11L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
Katrina KUCZYNSKI
6W–12L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
2.62
3
Barbara Longobardo
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.