Teams

SFV String Em' Along

SFV-Adult 18 & Over · SFV - Women 4.0 Weekend

10 players · average NTRP 3.90 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-15vs SFV Double BreakersLost 01
L#1 DoublesDelia Holguin / Ani Aratounians vs Sue Inthavong / Sherri Finnegan6-7, 2-6
2021-05-08vs SFV Shot GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMonica Mitchell / Carrie Gasper vs Teresa Loveland / Donna Nacey7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2021-05-02vs SFV Team CourtenaySplit 11
L#1 SinglesMonica Mitchell vs Paula Evans4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDelia Holguin / Carrie Gasper vs Cathi Ascani / Wangie Pineda4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 DoublesAni Aratounians / Parisa Talebian vs Jo-Ann Coleman / Kathrina Cruz0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDidi Sowul / Amy Hasquet vs Theresa Chase / Christy Feinfield1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-04-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Hasquet / Ani Aratounians vs Anna Lyke / Liz Iacuzzi2-6, 0-6
2021-04-10vs SFV Team SchwartzWon 10
W#1 DoublesDelia Holguin / Monica Mitchell vs Joann Miles / Elizabeth Hackelton6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV - Women 4.0 Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Monica Mitchell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Delia Holguin
published 4
3.74
Parisa Talebian
published
3.69
Suzie Yamamoto
published
3.61
Mary Manix
published
3.58
Erin MacKie
published 4
3.57
Amy Hasquet
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.53
Lisa Bourne
published
3.35
Ani Aratounians
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.16
Carrie Gasper
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Hasquet + Ani Aratounians044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Monica Mitchell
77W–72L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Delia Holguin
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Parisa Talebian
8W–4L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.74
Suzie Yamamoto
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
Mary Manix
5W–5L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Erin MacKie
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Amy Hasquet
92W–169L career · 2 lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
3.57
Lisa Bourne
9W–20L career · no lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Ani Aratounians
73W–121L career · 3 lines in 2021
87%13%<1%
3.35
3.5
Carrie Gasper
189W–211L career · 5 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.