Teams

Rabinowitz/LR/CCLR

2024 Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-12vs Shaddock/LR/LRACWon 20
W#1 SinglesHannah Rabinowitz vs Aislinn Andrews6-4, 6-0
W#2 SinglesAllison Anthony vs Ashley Burch5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-11-14vs Shaddock/LR/LRACWon 21
W#1 SinglesBailey Pollock vs Mary Thalheimer2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Blackshaw vs Natalie Gorman4-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesAllison Anthony vs Aislinn Andrews6-1, 6-1
2024-11-06vs Jennings-PVCCWon 21
W#1 SinglesBailey Pollock vs Lindsey Dail6-2, 6-0
L#2 SinglesBrittany Marsh vs Lindsey Wittenberg5-7, 4-6
W#3 SinglesMary Nell McBryde vs Laura Hum6-3, 6-4
2024-10-29vs Watts/NLR/BPWon 30
W#1 SinglesHannah Rabinowitz vs Brandi Watts6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Blackshaw vs Denise Allen-Duff6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesElizabeth Daniel vs Holly Taylor6-3, 6-4
2024-10-21vs Hicks/LR/RebWon 20
W#1 SinglesBailey Pollock vs Hayley Hackett6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesBrittany Marsh vs Jessica Doose6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Hannah Rabinowitz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.13
Elizabeth Blackshaw
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.00
Bailey Pollock
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
2.97
Allison Anthony
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
2.79
Elizabeth Daniel
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Brittany Marsh
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.47
Mary Nell McBryde
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #3 Singles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hannah Rabinowitz + Elizabeth Blackshaw404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hannah Rabinowitz
22W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Elizabeth Blackshaw
24W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Bailey Pollock
13W–4L career · 5 lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Allison Anthony
21W–9L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.97
Elizabeth Daniel
10W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Brittany Marsh
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Nell McBryde
7W–10L career · 6 lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.