Teams

Bake - Queens of the Court

2023 SCTA Doubles - Bakersfield · 3.5 Women's-Bake

16 players · average NTRP 3.69 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-11-05vs Bake - Team HollidayWon 10
W#1 DoublesLauren Eittreim / Briana Starr vs Rhonda Slegers / Linette Holliday6-2, 7-5
2023-10-08vs Bake - Team HollidayWon 10
W#2 DoublesBriana Starr / Lauren Eittreim vs Linette Holliday / Ashley Periera6-2, 6-3
2023-09-24vs Bake - Team HollidayWon 10
W#2 DoublesBriana Starr / Lauren Eittreim vs Susan Frakes / Rhonda Slegers6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women's-Bake have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Briana Starr
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Linh Bui
published
3.66
Lauren Eittreim
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Hyejung Oh
published 4
3.31
Brooke Fernandez
published 3.5
3.23
Diane Bashirtash
published 3.5
3.21
Erika Gatson
published 3.5
3.13
Sandra Gamboa
published
3.12
Crystal Neptune
published 3.5
3.11
Rebecca Badgett
published
3.08
Krista Rodriguez
published
3.07
Cheryl Garone
published 3.5
3.04
Nahla Tamer
published
3.00
Jeannie Munn
published
Rosemarie Galindo
published
Terry Echeverria
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Briana Starr + Lauren Eittreim33365% games+9.3% vs expected
Rebecca Badgett + Sandra Gamboa3249% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Briana Starr
70W–12L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.90
Linh Bui
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Lauren Eittreim
57W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.66
4
Hyejung Oh
18W–2L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.65
3.5
Brooke Fernandez
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Diane Bashirtash
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Erika Gatson
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
Sandra Gamboa
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Crystal Neptune
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.12
Rebecca Badgett
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
Krista Rodriguez
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Cheryl Garone
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.07
Nahla Tamer
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
Jeannie Munn
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.00
Rosemarie Galindo
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Terry Echeverria
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.