Teams

GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Delgado)(EPTC#2)

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

18 players · average NTRP 3.10 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-11-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGeorgina Gonzalez / Daniela Baylon vs Alyssa Hinojos / Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker4-6, 2-6
2023-11-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesAlejandra Rodriguez Benavides / Daniela Baylon vs Regina Porras / Carmen Cardenas7-6, 6-1
2023-10-28Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMaria Alexandra Herrera / Alejandra Rodriguez Benavides vs Katherine Harrison / Jessie Lindsay0-6, 1-6
2023-10-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesAlejandra Rodriguez Benavides / Maria Alexandra Herrera vs Kismet Sozer / Sheby Parker6-4, 6-1
2023-09-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDaniela Baylon / Alejandra Rodriguez Benavides vs Jill Overley / Ariana Guerrero3-6, 4-6
2023-09-16Lost 01
L#2 DoublesGeorgina Gonzalez / Alejandra Rodriguez Benavides vs Allene Mirazo / Diana Calhoun0-6, 4-6
2023-09-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAlejandra Rodriguez Benavides / Maria Alexandra Herrera vs Celia Al-Tahan / Patricia Samonte3-6, 1-6
2023-08-26Split 11
L#2 DoublesAlejandra Rodriguez Benavides / Daniela Baylon vs Angelica Neve / Cristal Tirado5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBrenda Campos Chacon / Georgina Gonzalez vs Roma Fonseca / Sabrina Monroy1-6, 4-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2024 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Ana Lucia Sanchez
usually #1 Singles 64%, also #2 Singles 27% · published 3.5
3.11
Daniela Baylon
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.79
Brenda Campos Chacon
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3
Alejandra Rodriguez Benavides
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
CRISTINA MASUMI PABLOS TOMIDA
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3
Felma Ramirez
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Georgina Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ida Santillan
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
Ilse Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Jaqueline Martinez Mendoza
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Lizeth Alejandra Torres Castaneda
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Maria Alexandra Herrera
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Maria Juarez
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
Myrna Dominguez
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Perla Manriquez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Polet Trevino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sandy Salazar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
Zaira Delgado
usually #1 Doubles 26%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lizeth Alejandra Torres Castaneda + Ilse Martinez4162% gamesnot enough data
Lizeth Alejandra Torres Castaneda + CRISTINA MASUMI PABLOS TOMIDA224 matchesnot enough data
Brenda Campos Chacon + Daniela Baylon213 matchesnot enough data
Maria Alexandra Herrera + Alejandra Rodriguez Benavides123 matchesnot enough data
Alejandra Rodriguez Benavides + Daniela Baylon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ana Lucia Sanchez
22W–9L career · 11 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
3
Daniela Baylon
42W–21L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.11
3
Brenda Campos Chacon
25W–15L career · 14 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Alejandra Rodriguez Benavides
2W–5L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
CRISTINA MASUMI PABLOS TOMIDA
7W–8L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Felma Ramirez
7W–24L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Georgina Gonzalez
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ida Santillan
25W–13L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ilse Martinez
5W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jaqueline Martinez Mendoza
35W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lizeth Alejandra Torres Castaneda
23W–21L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maria Alexandra Herrera
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maria Juarez
11W–3L career · 14 lines in 2024
not enough data
Myrna Dominguez
6W–14L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Perla Manriquez
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Polet Trevino
17W–21L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sandy Salazar
11W–6L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Zaira Delgado
54W–34L career · 21 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.