Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Assemi/Handlon

2022 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 3.5W AM

11 players · average NTRP 3.60 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-09vs Sports Mall-Henderson/WalljasperWon 21
L#1 DoublesLaurie Summers / Crystal Richardson vs Debra Knowlton / Stacy Criddle1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAngie Christensen vs Jennifer Sampson2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeanette Shepard / Shoeleh Assemi vs Yoko Walljasper / Inga Nelson6-1, 6-2
2022-08-02Won 20
W#2 DoublesLaurie Summers / Crystal Richardson vs Collette Renstrom / Jan Watts6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNamrata Handlon / Allison Kendell vs Nooshin Prasthofer / Mary Jane Swalberg6-0, 6-1
2022-07-26vs Red Ledges-Clark/ChristensenWon 21
L#1 DoublesCrystal Richardson / Laurie Summers vs Heidi Clark / Rachel Ray4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNamrata Handlon / Mindi Paskins vs Melinda Romney / Arlene Racker6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle Taggart / Jennifer Sweat vs Jen Dagley / Marian Christensen6-4, 7-6
2022-07-19vs Liberty Park Tennis-Love/MillerLost 12
L#1 SinglesShoeleh Assemi vs Jacki Joseph1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Sweat / Michelle Taggart vs Sarah Love / Lindsay Andersen1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLaurie Summers / Crystal Richardson vs Tana Coleman / Carrie Johnson6-3, 6-1
2022-07-12vs Cottonwood Club-Annunziata/SimmonsSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMaryam Klock / Laurie Summers vs Kelly Webster / Malisa Bowen6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAngie Christensen vs Alli Gardner4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJennifer Sweat / Michelle Taggart vs Lauren Annunziata / Karen Rozsa7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJeanette Shepard / Allison Kendell vs Audrey Dufel / Jodi Driscoll6-4, 6-4
2022-06-28vs Ivory Ridge-Allen/SmithSplit 22
L#1 DoublesNamrata Handlon / Mindi Paskins vs Angie Haskins / Nicole Miller4-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesAngie Christensen vs Elizabeth Lohner6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesShoeleh Assemi / Maryam Klock vs Catherine Peterson / Bessy Nielson6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAllison Kendell / Jeanette Shepard vs Amy Allen / Jennifer Hardin6-4, 6-1
2022-06-21vs RISE AC-Mower/LongsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesNamrata Handlon / Mindi Paskins vs Nicole Garff / Stacey Schmerse6-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesShoeleh Assemi vs Mary Vander Straten7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJeanette Shepard / Allison Kendell vs Mary Silver / Glenna Frey6-3, 6-0
2022-06-14Lost 12
L#1 DoublesNamrata Handlon / Mindi Paskins vs Katri Koehle / Lindsey Ramage5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesShoeleh Assemi vs Sherston Faux6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeanette Shepard / Michelle Taggart vs Jennifer Stringham / Kristi Parker7-5, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Angie Christensen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.41
Jeanette Shepard
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
Allison Kendell
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Maryam Klock
usually #1 Doubles 31%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Mindi Paskins
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
2.96
Jennifer Sweat
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Crystal Richardson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Laurie Summers
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Michelle Taggart
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Namrata Handlon
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Shoeleh Assemi
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Namrata Handlon + Mindi Paskins9557% games+12.4% vs expected
Jeanette Shepard + Mindi Paskins12359% games+6.8% vs expected
Jeanette Shepard + Allison Kendell7648% games+2.9% vs expected
Namrata Handlon + Shoeleh Assemi9851% games+2.9% vs expected
Namrata Handlon + Allison Kendell8652% games+2.5% vs expected
Laurie Summers + Jeanette Shepard3354% games+2.1% vs expected
Laurie Summers + Maryam Klock9549% games+1.8% vs expected
Jennifer Sweat + Allison Kendell1537% games−0.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angie Christensen
44W–18L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Jeanette Shepard
195W–143L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Allison Kendell
74W–56L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Maryam Klock
77W–92L career · 16 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Mindi Paskins
238W–179L career · 9 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06
Jennifer Sweat
135W–130L career · 12 lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
2.96
Crystal Richardson
23W–23L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Laurie Summers
46W–63L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Taggart
13W–30L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Namrata Handlon
62W–57L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Shoeleh Assemi
37W–81L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.