Teams

Hasty - Highland Country Club 7.0-40+

Sandhills Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 40 & Over Mixed Doubles

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-07-26vs Morgan - Gates Four 7.0 40+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrea Tatman / Matthew Tatman vs Anthony Williams / Yuko Resseguie4-6, 2-6
2023-07-12vs Morgan - Gates Four 7.0 40+Split 11
L#1 DoublesDavid Shell / Serriah Ciccone vs Gene Autry / Emily Morgan5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMatthew Tatman / Andrea Tatman vs Douglas Hedges / Laurie Cherry6-3, 6-3
2023-06-21vs Morgan - Gates Four 7.0 40+Won 10
W#2 DoublesMatthew Tatman / Andrea Tatman vs Kathy Fick / Malcolm Harris7-5, 6-3
2023-06-14vs Morgan - Gates Four 7.0 40+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAndrea Tatman / Matthew Tatman vs Anthony Williams / Laurie Cherry6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 40 & Over Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Andrea Tatman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.38
Katherine Armstrong
published
3.35
Kim Hasty
published 3.5
3.18
Dawn Dixon
published 3.5
3.17
Robert Hammond
published
3.15
Marion Bryan
published
3.14
Matthew Tatman
published
3.13
David Hasty
published 3.5
2.81
Tammy Keller
published
2.78
Daniel Gordon
published 3.5
2.75
Serriah Ciccone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Lisa Maher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Hasty + David Hasty13454% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrea Tatman
77W–64L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.79
Katherine Armstrong
25W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Kim Hasty
148W–106L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Dawn Dixon
33W–30L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
Robert Hammond
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.17
Marion Bryan
18W–27L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
Matthew Tatman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
David Hasty
26W–24L career · type M · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
Tammy Keller
24W–30L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
3.5
Daniel Gordon
0W–9L career · no lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
2.78
3
Serriah Ciccone
49W–54L career · 1 line in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
Lisa Maher
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.