Teams

Piedmont Park (Jessica McGowan)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 4.0 Women (Fong Huang)

18 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-12-14vs Sandy Springs (Christina Abrams)*Lost 14
L#1 DoublesKyoung Lee / Jessica McGowan vs Charlotte Disley / Amanda Newton6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJordan Harbin vs Jayme Merriam2-6, 6-4, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMargaret Lester / Tristain Yankosky vs Kealy Hartman / Laine Hartman3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLuci Ponder / Tayna Gardner vs Catherine Yealy / Murphy Ferguson4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#4 DoublesKelly Lindquist Fojas / Shimley Reynolds vs Cristina Abreu / Bridgette Krauter7-6, 6-3
2024-11-09vs Carl Sanders (Laura Booth)*Won 32
L#1 DoublesShimley Reynolds / Kyoung Lee vs Deanna Knieriem / Kristina Benavides3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLaurentia Soedarto vs Kristin Traina2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Lindquist Fojas / Michele Wetherington vs Andrea Crase / Laura Criscuolo6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesErin Everhart / Meghann Gibbons vs Joanne Carabillo / Julia Doyle6-2, 6-3
W#4 DoublesSutton Boling / Nicole Liddon vs Kristin Buhay / Sarah Grace Lyndale7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (Fong Huang) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Shimley Reynolds
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.94
Jordan Harbin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.93
Michele Wetherington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Kelly Lindquist Fojas
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.84
Victoria Brock
published
3.81
Jessica McGowan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Meghann Gibbons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Sutton Boling
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Luci Ponder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Tayna Gardner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Erin Everhart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Laurentia Soedarto
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.64
Nicole Liddon
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Tristain Yankosky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
3.21
Margaret Lester
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kyoung Lee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Leslie Kaas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Everhart + Meghann Gibbons314 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Lindquist Fojas + Michele Wetherington404 matchesnot enough data
Jessica McGowan + Sutton Boling303 matchesnot enough data
Tristain Yankosky + Margaret Lester033 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Lindquist Fojas + Sutton Boling303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shimley Reynolds
12W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.96
Jordan Harbin
9W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
Michele Wetherington
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.93
Kelly Lindquist Fojas
35W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.91
Victoria Brock
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.84
Jessica McGowan
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Meghann Gibbons
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Sutton Boling
9W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Luci Ponder
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Tayna Gardner
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Erin Everhart
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Laurentia Soedarto
22W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Nicole Liddon
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Tristain Yankosky
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Cassie Turnipseed
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
Margaret Lester
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.21
Kyoung Lee
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leslie Kaas
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.