Teams

ATA Team/LR/BP

2024 Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Men - Local League at State

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-03vs Pautsch/BV/KTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesPeter Newey / Harold Specht vs James Carr / Rickard Hood3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJoe Shaver / DOUG GOLDEN vs Richard Branam / Kyden Reeh2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKeith Fletcher / Jeff Harrington vs Bruce Barkley / Paul Hurley2-6, 1-6
2024-11-03vs Pautsch/BV/KTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoe Shaver / Keith Fletcher vs Bruce Barkley / Ed Rogers2-3
L#2 DoublesPeter Newey / DOUG GOLDEN vs Richard Branam / Andy Watkins1-1
L#3 DoublesCarl Brown / Robert Lee vs Paul Pautsch / Kyden Reeh1-3
2024-11-02vs Pautsch/BV/KTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesCarl Brown / Harold Specht vs James Carr / Rickard Hood2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJeff Harrington / Robert Lee vs Bruce Barkley / Paul Hurley3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPeter Newey / Keith Fletcher vs Richard Branam / Kyden Reeh2-6, 1-6
2024-11-02vs Pautsch/BV/KTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoe Shaver / Robert Lee vs Bruce Barkley / Paul Hurley1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesCarl Brown / Keith Fletcher vs Richard Branam / Kyden Reeh3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJeff Harrington / Harold Specht vs Andy Watkins / Ed Rogers6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men - Local League at State have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Joe Shaver
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.60
Jeff Harrington
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Carl Brown
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
DOUG GOLDEN
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Harold Specht
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Peter Newey
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Keith Fletcher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carl Brown + Harold Specht1436% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joe Shaver
25W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Jeff Harrington
5W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Carl Brown
7W–29L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
DOUG GOLDEN
24W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.52
Harold Specht
17W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
Peter Newey
7W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
Keith Fletcher
13W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.