Teams

Team Lori

2023 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-03vs Christie WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKent Kaltenbach / Allison Burand vs Cynthia Henie / Tom Wolforth2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRichard Clendaniel / Barbara Jacobs vs Conita Mullett / Patrick Alley6-4, 6-2
2023-02-17vs Christie WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRichard Clendaniel / Allison Burand vs Douglas Henie / Cynthia Henie0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKent Kaltenbach / Lori Kaltenbach vs Patrick Alley / Song Bliss2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-02-10vs The UndecidedSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKent Kaltenbach / Lori Kaltenbach vs Bonnie Wickham / Zachary Vincent0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRichard Clendaniel / Barbara Jacobs vs Matthew Ezell / Sandra Denton6-3, 7-5
2023-02-03vs Christie WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRichard Clendaniel / Barbara Jacobs vs Conita Mullett / Douglas Henie2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLori Kaltenbach / Kent Kaltenbach vs Song Bliss / Tom Wolforth7-6, 6-4
2023-02-03vs The UndecidedLost 02
L#1 DoublesRichard Clendaniel / Allison Burand vs Bonnie Wickham / James Robinson2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLori Kaltenbach / Kent Kaltenbach vs Dana Griffin / Ed Ulman5-7, 6-7
2023-01-20vs The UndecidedSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRichard Clendaniel / Allison Burand vs James Robinson / Bonnie Wickham3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLori Kaltenbach / Kent Kaltenbach vs Joaquita Martin / Zachary Vincent7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The Undecided4212615142
2Team Lori2471125188

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Lori Kaltenbach
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
Allison Burand
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Barbara Jacobs
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Richard Clendaniel
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3
Kent Kaltenbach
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Kaltenbach + Kent Kaltenbach131444% gamesnot enough data
Richard Clendaniel + Allison Burand5454% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Jacobs + Richard Clendaniel2346% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lori Kaltenbach
74W–57L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Allison Burand
49W–52L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Barbara Jacobs
21W–47L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Richard Clendaniel
61W–93L career · type S · 11 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.74
Kent Kaltenbach
14W–18L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.