Teams

Mi.Ratliff18S

2025 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-29vs De.Farmer18S3.5Split 11
W#2 SinglesFrancisco Burbano vs Andrew Adams1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 SinglesTodd Sprouse vs PHI PHAM1-6, 0-6
2025-07-15Lost 01
L#2 SinglesDavid Testa vs Liam O'Boyle1-6, 6-7
2025-07-08vs Jo.Hasting18SLost 02
L#2 SinglesFrancisco Burbano vs Brooks Lowe5-7, 0-6
L#3 SinglesTodd Sprouse vs Josh Hastings0-6, 3-6
2025-06-28vs Br.Ross18SLost 02
L#1 SinglesDavid Testa vs Kyle Faltisco4-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesFrancisco Burbano vs Trey Morris1-6, 1-6
2025-06-17vs Le.Reece18SWon 10
W#3 SinglesTodd Sprouse vs Connor Beckerle6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-06-10vs Ma.Roschel18SSplit 11
L#2 SinglesDavid Testa vs Hamilton Garvey5-7, 6-7
W#3 SinglesFrancisco Burbano vs Brendan OConnor6-2, 6-2
2025-06-04vs An.Womack18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesDavid Testa vs Art Rimbert6-3, 6-4
2025-06-03Lost 01
L#3 SinglesTodd Sprouse vs Doug Quarles2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Michael Ratliff
published
3.48
Montgomery Fletcher
published
3.37
Mark Wood
published
3.30
David Testa
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Alex Radulovic
published 3.5
3.13
Francisco Burbano
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.94
Richard Johnson
published
2.84
Todd Sprouse
usually #3 Singles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
Vaibhav Parmar
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Todd Sprouse + Francisco Burbano6552% games+1.2% vs expected
Todd Sprouse + Montgomery Fletcher123 matchesnot enough data
Francisco Burbano + Michael Ratliff213 matchesnot enough data
Michael Ratliff + Montgomery Fletcher123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Ratliff
30W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Montgomery Fletcher
30W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Mark Wood
15W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
David Testa
22W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Alex Radulovic
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Francisco Burbano
79W–83L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
3.13
Richard Johnson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Todd Sprouse
85W–99L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
2.84
Vaibhav Parmar
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.