Teams

3.5 Amacker 55+

2026 Adult 55&Over-NE · Women 3.5

7 players · average NTRP / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-08vs NEAL 55 3.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesTerri Amacker / Kathy Beasley vs Kathy Weatherford / Laura Wright1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMary King / Sandy Morris vs Dalisa Neal / Parker Spees2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMaggie Hamilton / Kathy Kelly vs Stephanie West / Vicky Lindsey6-3, 6-4
2026-03-24vs NEAL 55 3.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesGentry Parker / Jenny Wright vs Barbara Eaton / Laura Wright2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMaggie Hamilton / Nancy Lewis vs Catherine Policicchio / Lynn Gibson2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaria Bearden / Cyndi Sullivan vs Elise Otis / Debbie Ray5-7, 1-6
2026-03-18vs NEAL 55 3.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMaggie Hamilton / Kathy Kelly vs Kathy Weatherford / Barbara Eaton4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKathy Beasley / Gentry Parker vs Gay Ramsey / Parker Spees2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMaria Bearden / Sandy Morris vs Dalisa Neal / Allana McElwain0-6, 4-6
2026-03-10vs NEAL 55 3.5Lost 02
L#2 DoublesNancy Lewis / Cyndi Sullivan vs Gay Ramsey / Catherine Policicchio3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMaggie Hamilton / Kathy Kelly vs Nena Lowe / Allana McElwain6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-03-03vs NEAL 55 3.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMaggie Hamilton / Kathy Kelly vs Debbie Ray / Nena Lowe6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTerri Amacker / Nancy Lewis vs Laura Wright / Elise Otis1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Beasley / Sandy Morris vs Lynn Gibson / Stephanie West2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NEAL 55 3.550123791
23.5 Amacker 55+0531226175

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Maria Bearden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Nancy Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Sandy Morris
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.73
Gentry Parker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.58
Maggie Hamilton
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #4 Doubles 22% · published
2.47
Kathy Beasley
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.38
Terri Amacker
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terri Amacker + Kathy Beasley2537% games+2.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Bearden
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.02
Nancy Lewis
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.92
Sandy Morris
7W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Gentry Parker
13W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Maggie Hamilton
23W–23L career · 9 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
Kathy Beasley
6W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47
Terri Amacker
8W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.