Teams

WegnerReid/Knoxville

2026 Adult 18 & Over-Knoxville · 2.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-19vs DoironTapp/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesSarah Reid / Kelsey Stone vs Erika Morris / Kim Powell1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTricia Solberg vs Lindsey Gallaher5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRebecca Cantrell / Jenny Burghardt vs Robyn Doiron / Kellye Tapp6-1, 6-4
2026-05-12vs Blackburn/KnoxvilleLost 01
L#1 DoublesTricia Solberg / Ann Wegner vs Brittany Dilworth / Megan Parker3-6, 0-6
2026-05-04vs Burks-Buchanan/KnoxvilleWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnn Wegner / Rebecca Cantrell vs Mindy Blakeslee / Meredith Godbold6-1, 6-0
2026-04-21vs Backus/KnoxvilleLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Cantrell / Krista McIntosh vs Alex Quinn / Carrie Wegryn4-6, 2-6
2026-04-14vs DoironTapp/KnoxvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Crook / Sarah Reid vs Lindsey Gallaher / Kim Powell3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKelsey Stone / Ann Wegner vs Robyn Doiron / Kellye Tapp6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-04-07Won 20
W#1 DoublesRebecca Cantrell / Tricia Solberg vs Rachel Sampson / Celeste Fillauer6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJennifer Crook vs Lauren Bosse6-2, 6-0
2026-03-31vs Niles-Holt/KnoxvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesSarah Reid / Kelsey Stone vs Julie Niles / Sherry van Beke6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAnn Wegner vs Heather Carroll6-2, 6-0
2026-03-24vs Blackburn/KnoxvilleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Crook / Tricia Solberg vs Brittany Dilworth / Kimberly Ford6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRebecca Cantrell vs Lexi Blackburn1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.23 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.35
Rebecca Cantrell
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.29
Ann Wegner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.29
Jennifer Crook
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.19
Tricia Solberg
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.06
Kelsey Stone
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Cantrell + Ann Wegner303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Cantrell
13W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Ann Wegner
13W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.29
Jennifer Crook
7W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.29
Tricia Solberg
5W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Kelsey Stone
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.