Teams

WI Combo 7.5M Mequon Elite Ouy

2024 WI Combo · WI Combo 7.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#2 DoublesSteve Wissink / Nathan Tunks vs Ronald Haidinger / Steve Sobieski4-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesSteve Wissink / Nathan Tunks vs Dan Eggers / Jeffrey Kamrow0-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesBrett Meddaugh / Steve Wissink vs Ronald Haidinger / Steve Sobieski6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTung Ouy / Dylan Meyer vs Daniel Henkel / Daniel Kimmel6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGreg Schibbelhut / Jeffree Herde vs Jeffrey Kamrow / Jim Stefl3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesBrett Meddaugh / Steve Wissink vs Ronald Haidinger / Steve Sobieski4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDylan Meyer / Tung Ouy vs Jim Stefl / Jeffrey Kamrow4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJeffree Herde / Nathan Tunks vs Daniel Henkel / Daniel Kimmel4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WI Combo 7.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Combo 7.5M Mequon Elite Deppisch3193781
2WI Combo 7.5M Mequon Elite Ouy133919126

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Brett Meddaugh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Dylan Meyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Greg Schibbelhut
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Jeffree Herde
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nathan Tunks
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Steve Wissink
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Tung Ouy
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 46% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Wissink + Tung Ouy224 matchesnot enough data
Steve Wissink + Brett Meddaugh314 matchesnot enough data
Dylan Meyer + Tung Ouy224 matchesnot enough data
Tung Ouy + Nathan Tunks404 matchesnot enough data
Tung Ouy + Greg Schibbelhut134 matchesnot enough data
Steve Wissink + Nathan Tunks123 matchesnot enough data
Jeffree Herde + Nathan Tunks033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brett Meddaugh
28W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.83
Dylan Meyer
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Greg Schibbelhut
16W–19L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeffree Herde
12W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nathan Tunks
16W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Steve Wissink
11W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tung Ouy
53W–23L career · 13 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.