Teams

Bupp

2025 Tri Level Men · 4.5,4.0,3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / WESTERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-12-06vs ROC: ServedLost 01
L#1 DoublesManuel Castillo / Stephen Repass vs Patrick Clark / Tim Riskie0-6, 1-6
2025-11-08vs Federer Was BettererLost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Bailey / Manuel Castillo vs Nathan Allen / Tomas Reese1-6, 2-6
2025-10-25vs ROC: ServedLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael Bupp / Manuel Castillo vs Cliff Bundick / Jeffrey Tankel4-6, 0-6
2025-10-12vs Smash BrosLost 01
L#3 DoublesRudolph Pugliese / Nick Hunter vs Kurt Meichtry / Jackson Tran2-6, 1-6
2025-10-04vs Federer Was BettererLost 01
L#3 DoublesNick Hunter / Rudolph Pugliese vs Eric Hetzke / Eric Samuels2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.5,4.0,3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ROC: Served7118614153
2Federer Was Betterer35121227216
3Kelly/Stohr3571735226
4Bupp0861837263

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Stephen Repass
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.78
Michael Bupp
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
Chris Bailey
published 4
3.63
Manuel Castillo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.60
William Spencer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.31
Chris Crockett
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Graham Brown
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nick Hunter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sambit Mohapatra
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephen Repass + Michael Bupp5253% games−0.6% vs expected
Manuel Castillo + Michael Bupp4843% games−4.3% vs expected
Manuel Castillo + Stephen Repass1441% gamesnot enough data
Chris Crockett + William Spencer1437% gamesnot enough data
Chris Crockett + Nick Hunter224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephen Repass
13W–12L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Michael Bupp
105W–88L career · 11 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.78
4
Chris Bailey
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Manuel Castillo
16W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
William Spencer
31W–45L career · 5 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.60
3.5
Chris Crockett
30W–93L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
Graham Brown
16W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nick Hunter
10W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sambit Mohapatra
13W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.