Teams

Knight/BBTC 55+6.5

2025 Combo Doubles 55 & Over-GC · Women 6.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-19vs Pass Christian - GargiuloWon 21
W#1 DoublesSam Allen / Kathleen Mayer vs Courtney Schiro / Dana Delvescovo6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMarymargaret Kuhlmann / Laurie Baughman vs Vicki Rogers / Jo Ann Lozes6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAllene Balgord / Carrie Rester vs Lori Chrisman / Mary Bourdin6-4, 6-3
2025-10-09vs Diamondhead-BeddoeWon 21
W#1 DoublesJaime Denmark / Rebecca Mayfield vs Kristin Beddoe / Melissa Escher6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJolene McMorran / Audry Bush vs Stephanie Hardie / Karen Wilkerson4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesBridget Weatherly / Cathy Saunier vs Virginia Boyle / Pamela Hymel1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-09-22vs Kostal TOCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesSam Allen / Kathleen Mayer vs Shari Pol / Pamela Hoskins6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCathy Saunier / Bridget Weatherly vs Darlene Nichols / Lane Hoggard6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLinda Benigno / Carrie Rester vs Ann Guice / Elise Bourgeois6-0, 6-2
2025-09-16vs Biloxi-Lyons 55Won 30
W#1 DoublesRebecca Mayfield / Kathleen Mayer vs Terri Jordan / Melissa Steenkamp6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMarymargaret Kuhlmann / Bridget Weatherly vs Gerry MacKay / Trista Nash6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLinda Benigno / Laurie Baughman vs Celeste Bontemps-Geiser / Ellen Berry6-0, 6-2
2025-08-27vs TOCC MaxeyLost 03
L#1 DoublesCathy Saunier / Jaime Denmark vs Yvette Weeks / Carolyn Freeman3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAudry Bush / Laurie Baughman vs Sue Battaile / Toni Fillmore6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAllene Balgord / Anne Warren vs Elizabeth Mc MacKin / Terry OConnor6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2025-08-10vs Wixon SRYCWon 30
W#1 DoublesRebecca Mayfield / Jolene McMorran vs Gwen Thompson / Charlotte Gattis7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAllene Balgord / Kathleen Mayer vs Betty Burns / Teresa Acosta6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSam Allen / Carrie Rester vs Susan McCormick / Patti Christensen6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Women 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Knight/BBTC 55+6.55113512118
2TOCC Maxey5113513133
3Diamondhead-Beddoe3311717124
4Biloxi-Lyons 553371123175
5Kostal TOCC1531530195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Cathy Saunier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.15
Audry Bush
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Linda Benigno
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Rebecca Mayfield
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.08
Sam Allen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.01
Jaime Denmark
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Kathleen Mayer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.92
Laurie Baughman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Allene Balgord
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Carrie Rester
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Jolene McMorran
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.57
Marymargaret Kuhlmann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Bridget Weatherly
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.54
Anne Warren
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Benigno + Sam Allen6162% games+14.4% vs expected
Sam Allen + Kathleen Mayer8259% games+9.0% vs expected
Audry Bush + Rebecca Mayfield5654% games+7.0% vs expected
Linda Benigno + Jaime Denmark3257% gamesnot enough data
Allene Balgord + Marymargaret Kuhlmann134 matchesnot enough data
Audry Bush + Jaime Denmark404 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Baughman + Jolene McMorran134 matchesnot enough data
Jolene McMorran + Kathleen Mayer134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cathy Saunier
27W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
3.35
3.5
Audry Bush
33W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Linda Benigno
42W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.14
Rebecca Mayfield
42W–33L career · 6 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Sam Allen
40W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Jaime Denmark
45W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Kathleen Mayer
38W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.92
Laurie Baughman
22W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
2.92
3.5
Allene Balgord
19W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.85
3
Carrie Rester
4W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jolene McMorran
23W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
Marymargaret Kuhlmann
18W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%30%70%
2.57
3
Bridget Weatherly
12W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.56
3
Anne Warren
10W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.