Teams

Elysium 2

2023 FALL A18&O Daytime Women · FALL 18&O 2.5W Thursday

11 players · average NTRP 2.80 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for FALL 18&O 2.5W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.33 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
DIANA BAIOCCHI
published 3
Emily Iddings
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.54
Amy Niekamp
published 3
2.34
Kara Casey
published
Cindy Lane
published 2.5
2.21
Catherine Bournstein
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 2.5
1.79
Judith Kander
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer Houser
published
Mindy Miller
published
Sacha Bonny
published
Saree Ellis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Saree Ellis + DIANA BAIOCCHI3456% games+9.5% vs expected
Amy Niekamp + Kara Casey4558% games+9.0% vs expected
Saree Ellis + Cindy Lane7452% games+8.7% vs expected
Saree Ellis + Catherine Bournstein4255% games+8.4% vs expected
Sacha Bonny + Kara Casey9457% games+6.7% vs expected
Cindy Lane + DIANA BAIOCCHI7456% games+5.4% vs expected
Amy Niekamp + Sacha Bonny4345% games−1.1% vs expected
Jennifer Houser + Judith Kander1632% games−2.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
DIANA BAIOCCHI
46W–46L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Emily Iddings
29W–35L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Amy Niekamp
51W–66L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
2.54
Kara Casey
50W–66L career · no lines in 2023
0%90%10%
2.34
2.5
Cindy Lane
34W–59L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Catherine Bournstein
49W–86L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.21
Judith Kander
28W–98L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.79
Jennifer Houser
21W–68L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mindy Miller
1W–20L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sacha Bonny
25W–26L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Saree Ellis
42W–87L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.