Teams

SFV Warner 300's

SFV-Adult 18 & Over · SFV - Men 4.0 Adult

8 players · average NTRP 3.94 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-05-29vs SFV AV StormersWon 20
W#1 DoublesSunny Trinh / Eric Schaefer vs Carlos Guarin / Eric Nations7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJason Perlman / MacLyn McRae vs Benjamin Hurvitz / Mark Glouner7-5, 6-4
2021-05-08vs SFV Team Osa MenWon 20
W#1 DoublesEric Schaefer / Sunny Trinh vs Brian Czerniak / Giancarlo Bertumen7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJason Perlman / MacLyn McRae vs Peter Chew / Paul de Lumen6-1, 6-1
2021-05-01vs LLW - SFV PVCC - Moe MagadesSplit 11
W#1 SinglesDavid Lubnow vs Raman Sain6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChad Fenwick / MacLyn McRae vs Shane Duffy / Dhruv Sareen3-6, 5-7
2021-04-18vs SFV Rooftop BallersWon 10
W#1 DoublesSunny Trinh / Chad Fenwick vs Mark Gasper / Lev Tauz6-3, 6-4
2021-04-10vs SFV Men of PauseLost 01
L#2 DoublesIan Drayer / MacLyn McRae vs Gil Garteiz / Jimmy Lee3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-04-03vs SFV Northridge QuakesLost 01
L#1 DoublesDante Pacifici / Sunny Trinh vs Alan Esguerra / Arniel Lagon4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-03-28vs SFV Match Tough BallersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesIan Drayer / MacLyn McRae vs Tony Lujan / David Ramirez7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGary Weinzimer / David Lubnow vs CLAUDIO PELISSERO / Paul Santi2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV - Men 4.0 Adult have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Sunny Trinh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.99
Chad Fenwick
published 4
3.85
Eric Schaefer
published 4
3.85
MacLyn McRae
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
Gary Weinzimer
published 4
3.40
David Lubnow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.39
Daniel Iwata
published 3.5
Aldo Argana
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chad Fenwick + Eric Schaefer5067% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Sunny Trinh
146W–67L career · 4 lines in 2021
50%50%<1%
4.00
4
Chad Fenwick
12W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%53%47%
3.99
4
Eric Schaefer
20W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
MacLyn McRae
94W–50L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Gary Weinzimer
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
David Lubnow
73W–69L career · 2 lines in 2021
78%22%<1%
3.40
3.5
Daniel Iwata
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Aldo Argana
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.