Teams

Furgal - Orange Crush- Ida Lee

2024 Loudoun Singles · Loudoun Singles 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-21vs Creighton Farms 3.0 RowleyLost 01
L#2 SinglesJennifer Annessa vs Stacy Mowry1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-10-08vs Aldridge - StoneleighWon 20
W#1 SinglesJennifer Annessa vs Tamra Howard-McAtee6-4, 6-0
W#3 SinglesLisa Furgal vs Dorothy Beach6-1, 6-4
2024-10-07vs WilsonSplit 11
L#1 SinglesCarey Mottet vs Peggah Wilson6-7, 3-4
W#2 SinglesStephanie Frauen vs Kayla Broussard6-3, 6-5
2024-10-03Lost 01
L#2 SinglesLisa Furgal vs Jill Vaughan1-6, 2-6
2024-09-19vs Aldridge - StoneleighWon 20
W#1 SinglesJennifer Annessa vs Patricia Yriart6-0, 7-6
W#2 SinglesLisa Kottmann vs Elizabeth McDonald6-2, 6-3
2024-09-17vs Marple - All The Single LadiesWon 20
W#2 SinglesLisa Kottmann vs Dawn Regan6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesCarey Mottet vs Maryam Aranee2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-09-12vs Creighton Farms 3.0 RowleySplit 11
W#2 SinglesJennifer Annessa vs Kelly Rowley6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesStephanie Frauen vs Stacy Mowry3-6, 4-6
2024-09-10vs WilsonSplit 11
L#2 SinglesCarey Mottet vs Jolene Lopez2-6, 4-5
W#3 SinglesLisa Kottmann vs Chandra Bittner6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
3.32
Hannah Auyang
published
3.24
Lisa Furgal
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Jennifer Annessa
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Lisa Kottmann
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Carey Mottet
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Stephanie Frauen
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.90
Niki Friedman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Furgal + Stephanie Frauen134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alexandra Robinson
36W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.33
Hannah Auyang
11W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Lisa Furgal
204W–131L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Jennifer Annessa
71W–49L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Lisa Kottmann
41W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Carey Mottet
111W–101L career · 3 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07
3
Stephanie Frauen
117W–162L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.05
Niki Friedman
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.