Teams

Bloomquist

2022 Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over · Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.83 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-13vs NewcomerLost 01
L#2 DoublesRichard Minor / William Bloomquist vs Jim Tacka / Jack Lavinder4-6, 1-6
2022-08-13vs SchneiderLost 02
L#1 DoublesWilliam Bloomquist / Richard Minor vs Andrew Berlin / John Wyche5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJames Murduck / Jay Miller vs Dan Fredman / Clayton Coker3-6, 3-6
2022-07-30vs NewcomerWon 20
W#1 DoublesRichard Minor / David Ponder vs Edward Dress / Jack Lavinder6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesWilliam Bloomquist / Lionel Whately vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-27vs SchneiderLost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Ponder / Joe Langlois vs Dan Fredman / Bechir Mehmedovich6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCharles Davis / James Murduck vs DONALD CRAWLEY / John Wyche2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesWilliam Bloomquist / Kenny Martin vs Vince Sbarra / Clayton Coker5-7, 4-6
2022-07-23vs NewcomerLost 02
L#1 DoublesRichard Minor / William Bloomquist vs Steve Newcomer / Gary Gladden3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Ponder / Clayt Lemme vs Edward Dress / Richard Albers6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-07-16vs SchneiderWon 30
W#1 DoublesClayt Lemme / David Ponder vs Dan Fredman / Dennis Weikel6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesWilliam Bloomquist / Richard Minor vs Andrew Berlin / Bechir Mehmedovich6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJames Murduck / Charles Davis vs Thomas Schneider / Clayton Coker7-5, 6-4
2022-06-28vs SchneiderLost 01
L#3 DoublesJay Miller / James Murduck vs DONALD CRAWLEY / John Wyche1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Ponder
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
James Murduck
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.25
William Bloomquist
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Joe Langlois
published
Richard Minor
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Bloomquist + James Murduck1433% gamesnot enough data
David Ponder + William Bloomquist134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Ponder
48W–24L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
James Murduck
34W–48L career · 4 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
William Bloomquist
68W–81L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Joe Langlois
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Richard Minor
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.