Teams

Yadkin/Clay/18+ 3.5

2026 Yadkin Valley Singles 18 & Over · Men 3.5 - Monday Evening

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-27vs Yadkin/Paukner/18+3.5Won 30
W#1 SinglesBrian Acker vs Austin Johnson6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMatt Crews vs Brad Stilwell6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesSpencer Powell vs William Swink6-2, 6-1
2026-07-20vs Yadkin/Ross/18+3.5Won 30
W#1 SinglesLogan Caldwell vs Arin Heath6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMatt Crews vs Bumsoo Ahn6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesSpencer Powell vs Ross Lowe7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-10vs Yadkin/Paukner/18+3.5Won 21
L#1 SinglesBrian Acker vs Lyle Paukner1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesMatt Crews vs Tyler Elseth6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 SinglesSpencer Powell vs William Swink6-1, 6-0
2026-06-29vs Yadkin/Ross/18+3.5Won 30
W#1 SinglesLogan Caldwell vs Ross Lowe6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJacobo Araujo Nieto vs Quinten Putzke6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesMatt Crews vs Arin Heath7-5, 6-4
2026-06-15vs Yadkin/Paukner/18+3.5Won 30
W#1 SinglesBrian Acker vs Lyle Paukner6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJacobo Araujo Nieto vs Brad Stilwell6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesSpencer Powell vs William Swink6-3, 6-2
2026-06-08vs Yadkin/Ross/18+3.5Won 21
L#1 SinglesMatt Crews vs Jack Grubbs6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJacobo Araujo Nieto vs Arin Heath6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesJeff Clay vs Bumsoo Ahn7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Men 3.5 - Monday Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Yadkin/Whitman/18+/3.58122513157
2Yadkin/Clay/18+ 3.57220720192
3Yadkin/Paukner/18+3.52762143282
4Yadkin/Ross/18+3.51862144285

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Logan Caldwell
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.41
Brian Acker
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Jeff Clay
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.32
Jacobo Araujo Nieto
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.29
Spencer Powell
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.19
Matt Crews
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Acker + Matt Crews3251% gamesnot enough data
Logan Caldwell + Matt Crews213 matchesnot enough data
Matt Crews + Jeff Clay123 matchesnot enough data
Jacobo Araujo Nieto + Jeff Clay033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Logan Caldwell
29W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Brian Acker
19W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
3.41
Jeff Clay
37W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Jacobo Araujo Nieto
16W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Spencer Powell
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Matt Crews
26W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.