Teams

Anderson/Middleton-TASC

2022 NETX Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Katie Socia
published
3.21
Stacy Cromer
published
3.18
Valerie Anderson
published
2.99
Amber Herrin
published 3.5
2.78
Sharon Beall
published
2.67
Suzanne Middleton
published
2.66
Penny Spellman
published
2.18
Erin Schroeder
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Socia
10W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
3.51
Stacy Cromer
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Valerie Anderson
12W–25L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Amber Herrin
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
2.99
Sharon Beall
1W–16L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78
Suzanne Middleton
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
Penny Spellman
8W–14L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Erin Schroeder
0W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2022
99%1%<1%
2.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.