Teams

SFV LLW - Killer Queens - Janine Baker

2023 Adult 55+ SFV Summer · SFV 55 & Over - Women 6.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.12 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-13Won 10
W#2 DoublesCHERYL KEEHNE / Salisa Wagner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-06vs SFV - Match PointSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTANIA JANICEK / Linda Palacios vs Meegan Hamilton / Pam Eyer6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAllyson Spielman Hagemeier / Salisa Wagner vs Gladys Gravelis / Norma Perez-Loustau2-6, 2-6
2023-07-22vs SFV - Match PointWon 20
W#1 DoublesTANIA JANICEK / Hanan Asfoury vs Gladys Gravelis / Pam Eyer7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCHERYL KEEHNE / Debora Townson vs Norma Perez-Loustau / Gladys Weiss6-2, 6-4
2023-07-08vs SFV - Match PointWon 20
W#2 DoublesCaroline Nold / CHERYL KEEHNE vs Gail Spear / Diep Ho6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSalisa Wagner / Bella Soroko vs Gladys Gravelis / Gladys Weiss7-5, 6-2
2023-06-24vs SFV - Match PointWon 10
W#1 DoublesTANIA JANICEK / Hanan Asfoury vs Mary Coladonato / Veronica Thorpe6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 55 & Over - Women 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
TANIA JANICEK
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Salisa Wagner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Janine Baker
published
3.04
Venita Ryan
published 3
2.95
CHERYL KEEHNE
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Hanan Asfoury
published 3
2.75
Cheryl Stolarski
published 3
Caroline Nold
published 3
2.60
Jenny Killgore
published
2.51
Linda Palacios
published
2.43
Bella Soroko
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

CHERYL KEEHNE + Salisa Wagner5355% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
TANIA JANICEK
102W–89L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Salisa Wagner
66W–62L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
Janine Baker
10W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
3.06
3
Venita Ryan
128W–97L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
CHERYL KEEHNE
42W–41L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Hanan Asfoury
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Cheryl Stolarski
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Caroline Nold
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jenny Killgore
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
2.60
Linda Palacios
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
2.51
3
Bella Soroko
0W–9L career · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.