Teams

TYCC - G. Coldiron

2021 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.14 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-08vs Hills - SVB/MillerLost 02
L#1 DoublesSamuel Biller / Kevin Platt vs Robert Miller / Chris Ricketts4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesGregg Coldiron vs Ray Eckstein2-6, 3-6
2021-07-05vs Avila Mutiny - J. EvansLost 01
L#2 DoublesGregg Coldiron / Samuel Biller vs Jeffrey Evans / Thinh Duong4-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesGregg Coldiron / Greg Bauer vs Greg Estroff / Geoffrey Jones4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSamuel Biller / Grant Garlick vs John Johnson / Eby Paul6-1, 6-4
2021-06-12vs Buckhorn Bringing The BoomWon 20
W#1 DoublesGregg Coldiron / Edward Peterson vs Amerigo Devera / Mark Spencer6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSamuel Biller / Kevin Platt vs Paul Zack / Donovan Pullen6-4, 6-3
2021-05-01vs Buckhorn Bringing The BoomSplit 11
L#2 DoublesGregg Coldiron / RICHARD CASEY vs Chris Thomas / Paul Zack4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSamuel Biller / Chase Pattillo vs Donovan Pullen / Kevin Trinh6-2, 6-2
2021-04-24vs Avila Mutiny - J. EvansLost 02
L#1 DoublesGregg Coldiron / Edward Peterson vs Chris Canfield / Ignacio Molina3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSamuel Biller / Bill Cantrell vs Thinh Duong / Jamie Mckibban7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2021-04-17vs Hills - SVB/MillerWon 20
W#1 DoublesGregg Coldiron / Michael Sagafi vs Chris Ricketts / Ray Eckstein5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSamuel Biller / Bill Cantrell vs John Williamson / Daniel Zantedeschi3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Samuel Biller
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
Edward Peterson
published 4.5
3.99
Taylor Garland
published
3.90
Grant Garlick
published 4
3.89
RICHARD CASEY
published
3.78
Bradford Hale
published 4
3.76
Chase Pattillo
published 4
3.65
Gregg Coldiron
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.63
Bill Cantrell
published 4
Kevin Platt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gregg Coldiron + Samuel Biller134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Samuel Biller
61W–85L career · 7 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Edward Peterson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Taylor Garland
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%52%48%
3.99
4
Grant Garlick
4W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
3.90
RICHARD CASEY
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Bradford Hale
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Chase Pattillo
3W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Gregg Coldiron
20W–35L career · 7 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Bill Cantrell
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2021
16%83%<1%
3.63
Kevin Platt
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.