Teams

Salt Lake Tennis-Bickmore

2024 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 3.0W

14 players · average NTRP 2.94 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-11vs Sunpro-Belliston/AndersonLost 02
L#2 DoublesJocelyn Pearson / Rebecca Myers vs LaRicia Belliston / Cyndi Madsen3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMari Bickmore / Stef Charlesworth vs Carrie Jensen / Kim Ward0-6, 1-6
2024-12-04vs Sports Mall-SweatLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Armstrong / Joann Kuncewitch vs Lauren Mccann / Carlie van Alfen1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-11-20vs Sunpro-Cardall/OliverosLost 12
L#1 SinglesMariam Azin vs Kari Bergeson6-7, 0-2
L#2 DoublesJoann Kuncewitch / Kristin Midyett vs Sandra Chamberlain / Jennifer Brotherson0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesStaci Dansie / Jocelyn Pearson vs Cari Cardall / Rosie Groesbeck6-2, 7-5
2024-11-13vs Wasatch Rec Center-RitchieSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLisa Armstrong / Joann Kuncewitch vs Jessica Ritchie / Tracy Davis3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMari Bickmore / Jocelyn Pearson vs Kristin Finlayson / Sabina Boies6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2024-11-06vs Ivory Ridge-NelsonLost 04
L#1 DoublesStaci Dansie / Jocelyn Pearson vs Gayle Waldron / Becky Nelson0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMariam Azin vs Ashley Taylor4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKristin Midyett / Joann Kuncewitch vs Mary Scoresby / Kyoko Jensen1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMari Bickmore / Rebecca Myers vs Gaylynn Gale / Allyson Smith4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-10-30vs Park City MARC-KruegerLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesLisa Armstrong / Jocelyn Pearson vs Sarah Yates / Dannan Siano0-6, 1-6
L#2 Female DoublesRebecca Myers / Cortney Nebeker vs Kelly Krueger / Amy Watson6-1, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Rebecca Myers
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.03
Cortney Nebeker
usually #2 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
3.01
Jamie Sorensen
published 3
2.74
Mariam Azin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.73
Cari Johnson
published 3
2.70
Jocelyn Pearson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Female Doubles 20% · published 3
2.65
Delia Bayna
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.49
Staci Dansie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 17% · published 3
2.48
Joann Kuncewitch
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.35
Lisa Armstrong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.32
Mari Bickmore
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.08
Kristin Midyett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Nooshin Prasthofer
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Stef Charlesworth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mari Bickmore + Jamie Sorensen3346% games+7.5% vs expected
Mari Bickmore + Rebecca Myers7560% games+6.5% vs expected
Jocelyn Pearson + Staci Dansie3642% games+6.5% vs expected
Mari Bickmore + Staci Dansie51144% games+2.5% vs expected
Kristin Midyett + Staci Dansie1844% games+0.9% vs expected
Jamie Sorensen + Delia Bayna2351% games+0.3% vs expected
Lisa Armstrong + Joann Kuncewitch1738% games−3.5% vs expected
Jocelyn Pearson + Jamie Sorensen122243% games−3.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Myers
111W–41L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Cortney Nebeker
45W–26L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.03
3
Jamie Sorensen
78W–102L career · no lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Mariam Azin
46W–56L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Cari Johnson
42W–75L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Jocelyn Pearson
59W–80L career · 5 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Delia Bayna
204W–265L career · 2 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Staci Dansie
50W–155L career · 6 lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
2.49
Joann Kuncewitch
15W–39L career · 4 lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.48
Lisa Armstrong
59W–152L career · 2 lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
2.35
3
Mari Bickmore
87W–239L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
2.32
2.5
Kristin Midyett
41W–130L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Nooshin Prasthofer
97W–124L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stef Charlesworth
45W–116L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.