Teams

DBrantmeyer (Queens)

2022 Combo Doubles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Combo 8.5 Men - Wed PM

9 players · average NTRP 4.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-05vs MFarley/BPaley (Weddington)Won 10
W#1 DoublesSteve Brinkman / Mike Boston vs Daniel Barbu / Douglas Hicks6-3, 6-2
2022-09-28vs RBredder (Carmel)Won 20
W#2 DoublesSteve Brinkman / Brian Cudney vs Eduardo Brea / David Grindstaff3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWayne Ernest / Robert Cazares vs Bill Clementi / Tom Shober6-3, 6-0
2022-09-14vs MFarley/BPaley (Weddington)Won 10
W#2 DoublesSteve Brinkman / John England vs Kevin Miller / Richard Gallagher6-2, 6-4
2022-09-07vs RBredder (Carmel)Won 10
W#2 DoublesSteve Brinkman / Brian Cudney vs Roger Bredder / Peter Estelle6-2, 6-3
2022-08-24vs MFarley/BPaley (Weddington)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert Cazares / Robert Fryer vs Mike Farley / Kevin Miller6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesWayne Ernest / Keith Gonzales vs Gordon Lowman / Ralph Martinez3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBrent Grayson / John England vs Scott Trapp / Richard Teat6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-08-17vs RBredder (Carmel)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSteve Brinkman / John England vs Daniel Comisar / Thomas Kraus6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Combo 8.5 Men - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Mike Boston
published 4
4.05
Steve Brinkman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.02
Jon Koceja
published
3.76
Brian Cudney
published 4
3.60
John England
published
3.58
Robert Cazares
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.51
Brent Grayson
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.48
Keith Gonzales
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
Wayne Ernest
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keith Gonzales + Mike Boston5169% gamesnot enough data
Mike Boston + Robert Cazares404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mike Boston
77W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%10%90%
4.17
4.5
Steve Brinkman
67W–60L career · 5 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
4.05
Jon Koceja
16W–16L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
4.02
4
Brian Cudney
22W–11L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
John England
7W–16L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Robert Cazares
29W–31L career · 2 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Brent Grayson
58W–37L career · 7 lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.51
4
Keith Gonzales
45W–62L career · 8 lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.48
Wayne Ernest
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.