Teams

Wahine Slama Jama

2026 Adult 55 and Over League · 8.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.95 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-16vs BoomersWon 21
W#1 DoublesCynthia Feike / Ruby Matsui vs Jeanne Dunn / Liezl Lao7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Armstrong / Petra Dupont vs Tracy Halbersleben / Elizabeth Stanley-Hunt3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTrudi Vierra / Tricia Wilstead vs Mona Decrinis / Deanna DiBiase6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-10vs MCC Team SpiritLost 12
L#1 DoublesIrene Ydens / Ruby Matsui vs Kimber Hoang-Street / Karen Sullivan2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMaylynn Ikioka / Petra Dupont vs Catherine Hall / Lisa Judge6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAbbie Murray / Jody Singsank vs Jennifer Goldyn / Tana Leander7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2026-05-02vs BoomersLost 12
L#1 DoublesLuanne Apo / Cynthia Feike vs Deanna DiBiase / Jill Kanahele6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRachel Christopher / Trudi Vierra vs Tracy Halbersleben / Elizabeth Stanley-Hunt3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRuby Matsui / Irene Ydens vs Pamela Dolin / Jeanne Dunn6-3, 6-1
2026-04-26vs Lovin' ItWon 30
W#1 DoublesRachel Christopher / Lore Lee Robello vs shar martin / Kelly Thayer6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLuanne Apo / Maylynn Ikioka vs Barbara Botkin / Bonnie Gray6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAbbie Murray / Jody Singsank vs Rita Ingstad / M Beverly Rivers6-2, 6-0
2026-04-18vs MCC Team SpiritWon 30
W#1 DoublesTrudi Vierra / Tricia Wilstead vs Tesha Newman / Deb Rinaldi6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCynthia Feike / Ruby Matsui vs Kimber Hoang-Street / Karen Sullivan7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPetra Dupont / Maylynn Ikioka vs Lisa Judge / Tana Leander6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2026-04-12vs Lovin' ItWon 30
W#1 DoublesLore Lee Robello / Tricia Wilstead vs Barbara Grandon / Andrea Karal6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusan Armstrong / Rachel Christopher vs Barbara Botkin / Elina Hartkopf6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRowena Nikki Baysa / Irene Ydens vs Gaela Prince / M Beverly Rivers6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wahine Slama Jama4213512125
2MCC Team Spirit4210818151
3Lovin' It0621634213

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Tricia Wilstead
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Rachel Christopher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.04
Ruby Matsui
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
4.04
Petra Dupont
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.91
Luanne Apo
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.90
Maylynn Ikioka
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.89
Irene Ydens
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Cynthia Feike
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Rowena Nikki Baysa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Trudi Vierra
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.51
Susan Armstrong
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.50
Abbie Murray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Daphne Okamoto
published 3.5
3.18
Lore Lee Robello
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Jody Singsank
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Trudi Vierra + Cynthia Feike3356% games+23.4% vs expected
Trudi Vierra + Susan Armstrong5065% games+14.1% vs expected
Trudi Vierra + Tricia Wilstead5070% games+8.7% vs expected
Cynthia Feike + Ruby Matsui17759% games+4.5% vs expected
Maylynn Ikioka + Cynthia Feike2344% games+4.0% vs expected
Maylynn Ikioka + Petra Dupont9162% games+2.1% vs expected
Susan Armstrong + Petra Dupont5253% games+1.3% vs expected
Tricia Wilstead + Rachel Christopher6847% games−7.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Tricia Wilstead
33W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Rachel Christopher
69W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
4.09
4
Ruby Matsui
55W–38L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
4.04
4
Petra Dupont
103W–66L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
4.04
4
Luanne Apo
119W–72L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Maylynn Ikioka
109W–67L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Irene Ydens
3W–1L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Cynthia Feike
88W–61L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.85
Rowena Nikki Baysa
90W–48L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Trudi Vierra
146W–95L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.61
Susan Armstrong
56W–41L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Abbie Murray
38W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Daphne Okamoto
30W–35L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lore Lee Robello
144W–98L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
Jody Singsank
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.