Teams

GSTL18/Leggett/Grand Dunes

2026 Tri Level 18 & Over · 2.5

18 players · average NTRP 2.83 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-09vs GSTL (A) 3.5-2.5W 18 & Over (Bone)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesGabriela Leggett / Alexandria Ramirez vs Genie Matthews / Patricia Horton0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesErica Guyton / Renee Lane vs Austyn Smith / Allison Powers4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJenifer Armeen / Jessica Lindstrom vs Allison Duff / Kate Johnston0-6, 0-6
2026-06-27vs GSTL (A) 3.5-2.5W 18 & Over (Bone)Split 11
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Fischer / Erica Guyton vs Kelli Martin Bone / Jennifer Walsh6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Laptewicz / Eileen Madden vs Allison Duff / Megan Haselden3-6, 1-6
2026-06-18vs GSTL (A) 3.5-2.5W 18 & Over (Bone)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesShannon Edwards / Alexandria Ramirez vs Beth Knight / Tiffany Plemmons0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKenza Miller / Ann Parker vs Bailey D'Ambrosio / Jennifer Walsh0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Laptewicz / Eileen Madden vs Allison Duff / Megan Haselden3-6, 1-6
2026-06-11vs GSTL (A) 3.5-2.5W 18 & Over (Bone)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKalina Petrova / Shannon Edwards vs Genie Matthews / Kelsey Nichols3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLorraine Pepe / Alexandria Ramirez vs Beth Knight / Kelli Martin Bone5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Parker / Joni Sappenfield vs Kate Johnston / Meghan Williams0-6, 3-6
2026-05-31vs GSTL (A) 3.5-2.5W 18 & Over (Bone)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKalina Petrova / Sarah Kirit vs Patricia Horton / Genie Matthews1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGabriela Leggett / Alison Roark vs Allison Powers / Kelli Martin Bone1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJenifer Armeen / Jennifer Laptewicz vs Megan Haselden / Allison Duff0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.41 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Elizabeth Fischer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Kalina Petrova
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Sarah Kirit
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Erica Guyton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Alison Roark
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Gabriela Leggett
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.64
Alexandria Ramirez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.62
Haley Corbett
published
2.50
Lorraine Pepe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.24
Kenza Miller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.23
Renee Lane
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.21
Eileen Madden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.11
Ann Parker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.11
Jessica Lindstrom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.10
Meredith Lukowski
published
1.96
Jenifer Armeen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
1.96
Jennifer Laptewicz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
1.94
Joni Sappenfield
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Kirit + Lorraine Pepe7354% games+13.4% vs expected
Elizabeth Fischer + Sarah Kirit2546% games+8.0% vs expected
Elizabeth Fischer + Erica Guyton4263% games+5.6% vs expected
Erica Guyton + Lorraine Pepe314 matchesnot enough data
Alison Roark + Haley Corbett224 matchesnot enough data
Gabriela Leggett + Alexandria Ramirez134 matchesnot enough data
Erica Guyton + Gabriela Leggett033 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Kirit + Gabriela Leggett213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Fischer
157W–73L career · 1 line in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.02
Kalina Petrova
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.81
Sarah Kirit
31W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
0%2%98%
2.80
Erica Guyton
18W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%3%97%
2.76
3
Alison Roark
14W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Gabriela Leggett
26W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%9%91%
2.69
3
Alexandria Ramirez
16W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.64
Haley Corbett
10W–8L career · no lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.62
Lorraine Pepe
21W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
0%51%49%
2.50
Kenza Miller
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Renee Lane
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
Eileen Madden
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
2.5
Ann Parker
2W–9L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Jessica Lindstrom
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Meredith Lukowski
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Jenifer Armeen
3W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Jennifer Laptewicz
1W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Joni Sappenfield
1W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.