Teams

SFV LLW - SF Volley Girls - Meredith Levine

2024 Team Singles 18+ SFV Winter · SFV 18+ Women 3.5 Singles

10 players · average NTRP 3.70 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-04-07vs SFV - Paseo AvengersWon 10
W#2 SinglesSamira Sizdahkhani vs TANIA JANICEK7-6, 6-2
2024-04-06vs SFV - Paseo AvengersWon 10
W#1 SinglesAli Laventhol vs TANIA JANICEK6-4, 6-4
2024-03-16vs SFV - Smashing QueensWon 10
W#1 SinglesElena Salinas vs Christine Chu6-1, 6-0
2024-02-25vs SFV - Nikki's Tennis Crew 3.5 WSWon 10
W#2 SinglesSamira Sizdahkhani vs Nazli Alimi6-1, 6-3
2024-02-24vs SFV - Nikki's Tennis Crew 3.5 WSWon 20
W#1 SinglesCarla Denker vs Paula Janos2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAli Laventhol vs WHITNEY Bliss6-2, 6-0
2024-02-10vs SFV - Smashing QueensWon 20
W#1 SinglesElena Salinas vs Wendy Correa6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesSamira Sizdahkhani vs Lourdes Duarte6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18+ Women 3.5 Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Samira Sizdahkhani
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.65
Iza Sob
published
3.48
Elena Salinas
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.38
Shannon Koeppen
published
3.37
Jo Ann Thrailkill
published
3.28
Amelia Stephenson
published 3.5
3.22
Ali Laventhol
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Carla Denker
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Mia Babilonia
published
Meredith Levine
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ali Laventhol + Carla Denker123 matchesnot enough data
Carla Denker + Elena Salinas303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Samira Sizdahkhani
130W–82L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Iza Sob
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Elena Salinas
140W–158L career · 2 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.48
Shannon Koeppen
29W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
Jo Ann Thrailkill
34W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.37
3.5
Amelia Stephenson
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Ali Laventhol
163W–119L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Carla Denker
158W–132L career · 1 line in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Mia Babilonia
6W–15L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.05
Meredith Levine
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.