Teams

SHC-Trank

2024 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Andrea Findley
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.79
Patrick Trank
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Matthew Trank
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Gregory Hobi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.44
Andrea Hobi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.41
Katie Terrill
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Chris van Leeuwen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
John van Leeuwen
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Kiersten Lake
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.93
Autumn Bunch
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.90
Jennifer Trank
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
Jeffery Terrill
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jeffrey Fuchs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 0
Results7 ties
2024-03-09Won 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Trank / Patrick Trank vs Cori Pierce / Christopher Shaw3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAutumn Bunch / Matthew Trank vs Kathy Ramsey / Anthony Guzzi6-4, 6-2
2024-02-25Won 21
W#1 DoublesHector M Salomon / Autumn Bunch vs Jeff Anhaltzer / Mary Head6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJeffery Terrill / Katie Terrill vs Tommy Atkins / Yanchen Qi7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Fuchs / Andrea Findley vs Haihua Su / Kai Zhang6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-02-18Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn van Leeuwen / Kiersten Lake vs Brad Johnson / Wendi Ouellette6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGregory Hobi / Andrea Hobi vs Troy Johnston / Patricia Eargle7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeffery Terrill / Katie Terrill vs Nick Hooker / Melanie DeSilva4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-02-09Lost 12
W#1 DoublesPatrick Trank / Jennifer Trank vs Agus Rusli / Chiharu Olsson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMatthew Trank / Autumn Bunch vs Harish Krishnamurthy / Angie Urrutia6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeffery Terrill / Katie Terrill vs Devin McMasters / Rosie Francis6-1, 6-2
2024-02-04Won 21
W#1 DoublesGregory Hobi / Andrea Hobi vs Tomoko Iwata / Shiloh Halsey6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKiersten Lake / John van Leeuwen vs Tiffany Bowie / Joe Malboeuf7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAndrea Findley / Jeffrey Fuchs vs Hilary Johnson / Carlos Silvas6-3, 6-0
2024-02-03Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAutumn Bunch / Matthew Trank vs Angie Urrutia / Devin McMasters7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJennifer Trank / Patrick Trank vs Edmund Yuan / Rebecca McMasters7-6, 6-2
2024-01-07Lost 02
L#2 DoublesAutumn Bunch / Patrick Trank vs Nina Hanson / Keith Main7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChris van Leeuwen / John van Leeuwen vs Colleen Nolan / Jered Cuenco6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Andrea Findley
95W–44L career
0%91%9%
3.92
4
Patrick Trank
87W–59L career
1%98%1%
3.79
4
Matthew Trank
78W–63L career
3%97%0%
3.68
3.5
Gregory Hobi
38W–30L career
0%77%23%
3.52
3.5
Andrea Hobi
63W–46L career
0%92%8%
3.44
3.5
Katie Terrill
28W–27L career
0%93%7%
3.41
3.5
Chris van Leeuwen
90W–38L career
0%93%7%
3.39
3.5
John van Leeuwen
55W–55L career
2%92%6%
3.32
3.5
Kiersten Lake
75W–60L career
1%98%1%
3.26
3
Autumn Bunch
68W–71L career
0%92%8%
2.93
3
Jennifer Trank
93W–104L career
0%96%4%
2.90
3
Jeffery Terrill
1W–10L career
not enough data
0
Jeffrey Fuchs
19W–18L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.