Teams

Hicks-St James

2024 South East Tennis Mixed Doubles 55 & Over · MIXED 55 & OVER 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-08-03vs RobinsonLost 01
L#2 DoublesMike Holstein / Melissa Martin vs Margaret Varga-Roberson / Gary Milner4-6
2024-07-29vs RobinsonWon 10
W#3 DoublesMelissa Martin / Mike Holstein vs Chuck Roberson / Margaret Varga-Roberson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-07-24vs Breen - St JamesLost 01
L#2 DoublesMelissa Martin / Mike Holstein vs Timothy Reilly / Carrie Guerrette3-6, 2-6
2024-07-21vs Tatum Mixed 55+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMike Holstein / Melissa Martin vs Stacey Anderson / Robert O'Malley1-6, 3-6
2024-07-10vs Breen - St JamesWon 10
W#3 DoublesMike Holstein / Melissa Martin vs Kelli Brownfield / Neal Montany7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 55 & OVER 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Dennis Werner
published 4
3.83
Daniel Hicks
published 4
3.82
Peggy O'Connell
published
3.79
Lynn Norris
published
3.78
Judi Leseur
published
3.76
Jerry Klawitter
published
3.41
Mike Holstein
published
3.35
Melissa Martin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Karen Fania
published
Nancy Wisniewski
published
Richard Hughes
published
Susan Barry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judi Leseur + Daniel Hicks303 matchesnot enough data
Jerry Klawitter + Peggy O'Connell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dennis Werner
27W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.95
4
Daniel Hicks
27W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.83
Peggy O'Connell
19W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.82
Lynn Norris
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.79
Judi Leseur
17W–12L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.78
Jerry Klawitter
12W–15L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
Mike Holstein
26W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Melissa Martin
58W–52L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.35
Karen Fania
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Wisniewski
44W–33L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Hughes
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Barry
32W–24L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.