Teams

Ch.Wasko40S

2024 Capital Singles 40 & Over · 4.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-07-24vs Da.Breazeale40SLost 02
L#1 SinglesChris Wasko vs J Barnes Stephenson2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesJay Reiff vs Robert Whitehurst3-6, 2-6
2024-07-17vs Is.Pataki40SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesDan Podrasky vs Kevin Sibillia6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesJonathan Drum vs Istvan Pataki4-6, 2-6
2024-07-13vs La.Brock40SLost 12
W#1 SinglesJay Reiff vs Lawrence Brock3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJonathan Drum vs Graham Schillmoller2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesChris Wasko vs Andrew Tate1-6, 1-6
2024-07-03vs Da.Breazeale40SSplit 11
L#2 SinglesJonathan Drum vs Daniel Breazeale2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesChris Wasko vs Edward Farley6-0, 6-2
2024-06-28vs Is.Pataki40SLost 12
L#1 SinglesDan Podrasky vs Matt Migliore1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJay Reiff vs Kevin Sibillia6-4, 6-2
L#3 SinglesChris Wasko vs Geoff Knight2-6, 1-6
2024-06-19vs La.Brock40SLost 03
L#1 SinglesJonathan Drum vs Lawrence Brock0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesDan Podrasky vs W Troutman3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesJay Reiff vs Jason Tuttle3-6, 6-7
2024-06-12vs Da.Breazeale40SLost 02
L#1 SinglesDan Podrasky vs J Barnes Stephenson3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesChris Wasko vs Will Johnson1-6, 1-6
2024-06-05vs Is.Pataki40SWon 10
W#2 SinglesDan Podrasky vs Istvan Pataki6-4, 7-5
2024-05-29vs La.Brock40SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesDan Podrasky vs Kenneth Krause6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJay Reiff vs Lawrence Brock3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Dan Podrasky
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.74
Jay Reiff
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 4
3.46
Chris Wasko
usually #3 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.44
Scott Hoffman
published
3.42
Jonathan Drum
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Singles 44% · published 3.5
3.42
John Gouveia
published
Alan McSwain
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Podrasky + Chris Wasko3251% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dan Podrasky
66W–47L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.82
4
Jay Reiff
45W–38L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
3.5
Chris Wasko
90W–83L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%61%38%
3.46
Scott Hoffman
15W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%34%
3.44
3.5
Jonathan Drum
102W–110L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.42
John Gouveia
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
3.42
3.5
Alan McSwain
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.