Teams

MARPLE- River Creek

2022 Loudoun Adult 40 & Over Women · Loudoun Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.80 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-25vs I'd Hit That - FarmsWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeanne Smith / Nancy Shepley vs Linda Chestnut / Kristen Kilguss6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesShelley Winants vs Kathleen Barnett6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSandra Moses / Carthina Marple vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-20vs NORMAN - Creighton FarmsLost 01
L#1 DoublesSandra Moses / Shelley Winants vs Carolyn Mccarter / Teresa Smith5-7, 0-6
2022-07-18vs NORMAN - Creighton FarmsLost 02
L#1 SinglesNancy Shepley vs Carey Mottet2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRobin Jones / Shelley Winants vs Teresa Smith / Kerry Guaglianone4-6, 7-6
2022-07-13vs LEIBOLD - AVSPLost 02
L#1 DoublesSandra Kim / Nancy Shepley vs Liz Ryan / Chandra Bittner6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSandra Moses / Shelley Winants vs Julianne Nitta / Sarah Blackwood1-6, 1-6
2022-07-11vs LEIBOLD - AVSPWon 10
W#2 DoublesShelley Winants / Nancy Shepley vs Liliana Michaels / Chandra Bittner6-2, 6-0
2022-07-06vs I'd Hit That - FarmsLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarianne Moore / Shelley Winants vs Janet Bradley / Catherine Chang3-6, 1-6
2022-06-20vs I'd Hit That - FarmsLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarthina Marple / Tina Stroupe vs Janet Bradley / Celeste Linthicum5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Shelley Winants
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.92
Nancy Shepley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.55
Sandra Moses
published
2.45
Leanne Smith
published
2.39
Carthina Marple
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.31
Sandra Kim
published
2.21
Amanda Klukowski
published 2.5
2.20
Tina Stroupe
published
1.94
Christie FitzGerald
published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Shelley Winants
127W–107L career · 6 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Nancy Shepley
82W–81L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
2.92
Sandra Moses
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
2.55
Leanne Smith
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
0%66%34%
2.45
2.5
Carthina Marple
50W–87L career · 2 lines in 2022
0%81%19%
2.39
Sandra Kim
18W–17L career · no lines in 2022
0%92%8%
2.31
2.5
Amanda Klukowski
10W–7L career · no lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.21
Tina Stroupe
9W–13L career · no lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.20
2.5
Christie FitzGerald
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
1.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.