Teams

R-E-D-Y Qi

2021 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.38 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Yanchen Qi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Devrie Brennan
published 3.5
2.97
Ann-Marie Lundberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Dipali Dixit
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2021-07-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRachel Nies / Dipali Dixit vs Barbara Gram / Rachael Seeger6-4, 6-3
2021-07-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDipali Dixit / Ann-Marie Lundberg vs Elizabeth Maguire / Ruth Semon6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2021-07-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRachel Nies / Yanchen Qi vs Karen Kraus / Sarah Larson6-4, 6-3
2021-07-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAnn-Marie Lundberg / Yanchen Qi vs Wanda Ng / Mihee Park7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2021-07-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesDipali Dixit / Ann-Marie Lundberg vs Kiersten Lake / Jennifer Trank6-2, 6-4
2021-07-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesYanchen Qi / Rachel Nies vs Madeleine Bourland / Jennifer Stevenson6-2, 6-3
2021-07-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesDipali Dixit / Ann-Marie Lundberg vs Sara Crate / Katie Jurgenson6-1, 6-0
2021-06-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesYanchen Qi / Rachel Nies vs Rochelle Pluymers / Rebecca Griffith4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Yanchen Qi
29W–55L career
not enough data
3.5
Devrie Brennan
53W–47L career
1%98%0%
3.24
3.5
Ann-Marie Lundberg
63W–71L career
41%59%0%
2.97
3
Dipali Dixit
40W–48L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.