Teams

Douglas

2025 Combo 40 & Over- Knoxville · 8.5 Women Combo Doubles

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-29vs Dill/IKnoxvilleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLindsey Stimets / Kristie Danby vs Kate Willis / Barbara Miller6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCarrie Hayes / Erin Upshaw vs Amanda Wilson / Brooke Browning2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-09-20vs Dill/IKnoxvilleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLindsey Stimets / Kristie Danby vs Emily Elison / Katie Rymer6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTori Hayes / Erin Upshaw vs Karen Lorino / Brooke Browning0-6, 2-6
2025-09-18vs Dill/IKnoxvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesWendy Petty / Marissa Turner vs Rachel Kimmel / Barbara Miller4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesErin Upshaw / Sarah Ross vs Jasmine Dabbs / Jennifer Brady6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLindsey Stimets / Robin Smith vs Tara Hurley / Amanda Wilson6-2, 7-6
2025-09-15vs Dill/IKnoxvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Oakley / Kristie Danby vs Misty Cottrell / Lauren Clarke6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLindsey Stimets / Sarah Ross vs Brooke Dill / Tara Hurley6-1, 6-2
2025-09-05vs Dill/IKnoxvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesLindsey Stimets / Kristie Danby vs Karen Lorino / Brooke Browning4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Oakley / Wendy Petty vs Rachel Kimmel / Barbara Miller0-6, 4-6
2025-08-09vs Dill/IKnoxvilleLost 02
L#2 DoublesSarah Ross / Carrie Hayes vs Kate Willis / Morgan Smith6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKristie Danby / Tori Hayes vs Barbara Miller / Karen Lorino4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women Combo Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Kristie Danby
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.88
Marissa Turner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.85
Wendy Petty
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.80
Lindsey Stimets
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.78
Erin Upshaw
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Tori Hayes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Carrie Hayes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tori Hayes + Carrie Hayes3541% games−14.9% vs expected
Carrie Hayes + Erin Upshaw0541% gamesnot enough data
Kristie Danby + Lindsey Stimets213 matchesnot enough data
Tori Hayes + Erin Upshaw033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristie Danby
16W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
4.15
Marissa Turner
16W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
Wendy Petty
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Lindsey Stimets
41W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Erin Upshaw
29W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Tori Hayes
11W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
4
Carrie Hayes
13W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.