Teams

Olympic 2

2026 SUMMER 18&O Mixed · Summer 7.0 Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 3.40 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings5 teams · Summer 7.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wickertree701837112
2The Players Club4312919169
3Olympic 14312920172
4Muirfield2561531204
5Olympic 21761838256

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Brandy Richards
published 3.5
3.37
Krista Eckelman
published
3.35
Jason Meeker
published
3.29
Beth Houck
published 3.5
3.27
Hallie Sisko
published
3.24
Adam Weisberg
published 3.5
3.15
Heather Pliskin
published
3.07
John Hougland
published
3.04
Alisa Disalvo
published 3.5
3.04
Kaoru Wilson
published
3.02
Jamie Must
published
2.95
Dennis Sterling
published 3
Ted Must
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Hougland + Kaoru Wilson1538% games+5.5% vs expected
Jason Meeker + Brandy Richards303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brandy Richards
107W–76L career · no lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
Krista Eckelman
110W–64L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.37
Jason Meeker
49W–30L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Beth Houck
176W–176L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Hallie Sisko
15W–10L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Adam Weisberg
18W–20L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Heather Pliskin
85W–74L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
John Hougland
7W–28L career · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Alisa Disalvo
97W–170L career · no lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
Kaoru Wilson
129W–177L career · no lines in 2026
38%61%<1%
3.04
Jamie Must
53W–83L career · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Dennis Sterling
7W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
Ted Must
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.