Teams

WTC - Muller 18 & Over 7.5 Men Combo

2026 Dothan USTA Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.67 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 15 6:00 PM
Paul Muller II
2026-09-01vs WTC - Johns 18 & Over 8.5 Combo MLost 02
L#1 DoublesPaul Muller II / Matt Langford vs Sean McKeague / Caleb Cruz3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLee Newton / John Wehrkamp vs Brad Brown / James Phillips3-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesJackson Dennis / Paul Muller II vs Brandon Bachman / Brandon Todd1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDoyle Leggett / Justin Thomley vs Brad Brown / Colby Shimabukuro4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLee Newton / John Wehrkamp vs Travis Sykes / Benjamin Odom4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WTC - Muller 18 & Over 7.5 Men Combo000000
2WTC - Brown 18 & Over 7.5 Men Combo000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Doyle Leggett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.26
Justin Thomley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Paul Muller II
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Jackson Dennis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Lee Newton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.18
Houston Holmes
published 3.5
3.16
Matt Langford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
John Wehrkamp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Houston Holmes + Justin Thomley4152% gamesnot enough data
Paul Muller II + Jackson Dennis314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Doyle Leggett
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
Justin Thomley
10W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
Paul Muller II
12W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Jackson Dennis
11W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Lee Newton
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Houston Holmes
17W–7L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
Matt Langford
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.16
John Wehrkamp
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.