Teams

Sets in the City (40+)

2021 Howard-Columbia Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over Women 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.58 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-08-02vs Oaksmith 3.5 (40+)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesTamara Hayes vs Jill Rose1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Snavely / Feliz Steele vs Elisabeth Garcia-Wade / Kim Neiss3-6, 3-6
2021-07-29vs Rally Girls 3.5 (40+)Won 10
W#3 DoublesDonna Slaughter / Julie Snavely vs Yngrid Sierra / Brenda Poore6-3, 6-0
2021-07-15vs Vitamin T (40+)Split 11
L#1 DoublesChristine Driscoll / Beyza Akcam vs Linda McArthur / Jodie Phillips3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDonna Slaughter / Julie Snavely vs Christine Lee / Shelley Swaim6-0, 6-2
2021-07-05Won 10
W#1 SinglesTamara Hayes vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-06-27vs Super SmashWon 10
W#1 DoublesMeghan Reinhart / Beyza Akcam vs Mei Moy-Lui / Jennifer Nazaire6-0, 6-4
2021-06-15vs ShotmakersLost 02
L#1 DoublesBeyza Akcam / Kellee Kramer vs Linda Shojaei / Jeanne Celtnieks4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJulie Snavely / Michele Synegal vs Nancy Carey / Rachel Sifri4-6, 3-6
2021-05-10vs SmashedWon 20
W#1 DoublesBeyza Akcam / Denise Martin Barnes vs Terri Bradford / Shelly Chamness6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTamara Hayes / Roslyn Waddy vs Jenifer Gesell / Jennifer Sheehan6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Lynne Powell
published
3.37
Beyza Akcam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.31
Karin Davis
published
3.26
Meghan Reinhart
published
3.24
Stephanie Ahmed
published
3.23
Feliz Steele
published 3.5
3.22
3.15
Julie Snavely
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Kelly Bellone
published
3.08
Rebecca Sellassie
published
3.02
Donna Slaughter
published 3.5
2.98
Tamara Hayes
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jessica Butcher
published
Shelley Sturtz
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynne Powell
16W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
3.43
4
Beyza Akcam
211W–250L career · 4 lines in 2021
83%17%<1%
3.37
Karin Davis
22W–14L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%8%
3.31
Meghan Reinhart
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
Stephanie Ahmed
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Feliz Steele
34W–26L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Denise Martin Barnes
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Julie Snavely
35W–79L career · 4 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.15
Kelly Bellone
8W–5L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.15
Rebecca Sellassie
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.08
3.5
Donna Slaughter
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
45%55%<1%
3.02
3.5
Tamara Hayes
78W–73L career · 3 lines in 2021
56%44%<1%
2.98
Jessica Butcher
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Shelley Sturtz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.