Teams

J10 Raintree Stahling

2024 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Weekday Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-17vs A1 Raintree EvansLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Moncure / Pam Koch vs Lisa Harmon / Kelly Smith3-6, 2-6
2024-07-11vs D4 ACAC Baby Got Backhand - JonesWon 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Penny / Carolyn Moncure vs Kimberly Jones / Martinique Kandl6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-07-10vs F6 Avalon HicksWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Moncure / Mona Stahling vs Jane Sisk / Mary Tankersley6-2, 6-0
2024-06-19vs I9 SCC TotaroWon 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Penny / Carolyn Moncure vs Stacey Piotrowski / Jann Clarke6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Weekday Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Carolyn Moncure
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Rebecca Schwartz
published
3.27
Sara Kamencik
published
3.25
Shannon Foster
published
3.25
Mandy Setliff
published
3.18
Megan Lloyd
published
3.15
Lisa Penny
published
3.09
Barbara Portanova
published 3.5
3.03
Mona Stahling
published
3.00
Peggy Bryan
published
2.88
Pam Koch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Megan Lloyd + Shannon Foster2351% games−10.4% vs expected
Mona Stahling + Lisa Penny123 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Penny + Carolyn Moncure123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carolyn Moncure
43W–66L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Rebecca Schwartz
9W–18L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Sara Kamencik
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Shannon Foster
15W–11L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Mandy Setliff
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.25
Megan Lloyd
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Lisa Penny
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Barbara Portanova
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.09
Mona Stahling
3W–11L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.03
Peggy Bryan
28W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
Pam Koch
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
2.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.